1984
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1984)110:2(245)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultimate Strength of Damaged Tubular Bracing Members

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ellinas [22] developed a simple design-oriented analytical formula to estimate the reserve-load carrying capacity of circular tubular beam-column members with overall bending and local denting damage. Mohammad and Masoud [23] investigated the structural behavior of preloaded tubular members under lateral impact loads by means of finite element method.…”
Section: A Simplified Calculation Methods Of Impact Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ellinas [22] developed a simple design-oriented analytical formula to estimate the reserve-load carrying capacity of circular tubular beam-column members with overall bending and local denting damage. Mohammad and Masoud [23] investigated the structural behavior of preloaded tubular members under lateral impact loads by means of finite element method.…”
Section: A Simplified Calculation Methods Of Impact Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted results agreed reasonably well with the experiments. Ellinas (1984) presented a simple method for estimating the reserved strength of damaged tubes with local denting damage, overall beam deflection, and combined local denting and overall deflection damage. The method showed a clear lower bound when compared to previous experiments and was conservative for safety considerations.…”
Section: Ultimate Strength Of Damaged Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For dented tubes, a few formulations exist (refer to e.g. Taby (1986) and Ellinas (1984)) that allow taking post-damage strength into account. Naderi et al (2009) carried out a static pushover analysis of a jacket platform under both intact and damaged conditions using USFOS.…”
Section: Residual Strength Of Damaged Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the light of the advancements in the ultimate limit state assessment of steel-plated structures [13], a better understanding of the collapse characteristics of damaged stiffened cylindrical shells predominantly subjected to axial compression is necessary. For the case of tubular members, which have a cylinder radiusover-shell thickness ratio of (R/t) in the range of 20 to 80 [14], the residual strength in damaged condition under various loading conditions has been investigated in a wide range of studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. According to the statistics [12], a higher collision risk exists for floating platforms than for fixed platforms with mostly tubular members.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%