2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of structural responses and design of offshore tubular structures subjected to ship impacts

Abstract: Over the past decades, the offshore oil and gas industry has developed rapidly. A large number of offshore structures, notably jacket and jack-up platforms, were constructed and installed worldwide. As they are often exposed to safety threats from impacts by visiting vessels and dropped objects, there has been a continuous interest in understanding the impact mechanics of tubular structures and proposing practical design standards to protect from collisions. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art with respect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil foundation was not modelled here, as the collision between supply vessel and platform is governed by minor collisions, which are defined as collision events characterised by low-impact velocities, incurring reparable damages to the platform and which does not call for cease of operation [21]. Therefore, the effect of soil characteristics on the damage of the platform is negligible [15,22]. Also, it is assumed that there is enough clearance between platform freeboard and sea level so that there exists no chance of any part of the vessel colliding to the topside module.…”
Section: The Extent Of Structures For Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The soil foundation was not modelled here, as the collision between supply vessel and platform is governed by minor collisions, which are defined as collision events characterised by low-impact velocities, incurring reparable damages to the platform and which does not call for cease of operation [21]. Therefore, the effect of soil characteristics on the damage of the platform is negligible [15,22]. Also, it is assumed that there is enough clearance between platform freeboard and sea level so that there exists no chance of any part of the vessel colliding to the topside module.…”
Section: The Extent Of Structures For Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNV GL [9,10] provided some specific guidelines and general requirements for the determination of structural capacity using NLFEA. Many researchers have performed the structural response analysis of individual tubular members against ship impacts, for instance [11][12][13][14][15]. Notaro et al [16] performed the numerical analysis of OSV collision to a fixed offshore structure, considering both bodies as deformable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example can be seem from the coupled shipjacket leg collision simulation in Fig. 23 reported in Yu and Amdahl (2018). This motion locking effect will increase the total energy dissipation and make the external dynamic model unconservative.…”
Section: Determination Of the Normal Vector Of The Contact Planementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various degradation issues faced by the ageing platform such as corrosion, weld crack, local denting, scour and subsidence [9][10][11][12][13]. These may affect the overall structural integrity of the platform as well as impede its operations as the redundancy and strength of the platform may decrease [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%