2015
DOI: 10.7763/ijet.2015.v7.764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultimate Experiment of Ruptured Concrete Beams Strengthened Using GFRP-Sheet after Fatigue Loads

Abstract: Abstract-An experimental study has been carried out to investigate the structural behavior of beam which was strengthened by glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP-S). The Experimental was carried out to determine the effect of fatigue loads on flexural capacity of reinforced concrete beams. Each specimen was 6 m long with 300x500 mm rectangular cross section. Each specimen was treated with different loads. In this study using two different loads applied to the beam was static loads and fatigue loads.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of different approaches have been investigated to assess the effectiveness of using FRP materials for rehabilitation of steel bridge girders including the repairing of naturally deteriorated girders. Strengthening or stiffening of the reinforced concrete and the prestressed concrete structures may be required as a response to an increase in load requirements, usage alteration, degradation of structure, and complexity in design as well as construction defects [1] [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of different approaches have been investigated to assess the effectiveness of using FRP materials for rehabilitation of steel bridge girders including the repairing of naturally deteriorated girders. Strengthening or stiffening of the reinforced concrete and the prestressed concrete structures may be required as a response to an increase in load requirements, usage alteration, degradation of structure, and complexity in design as well as construction defects [1] [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%