Abstract:ULCOS-Pilot testing of the low-CO 2 Blast Furnace process at the experimental BF in Luleå The ULCOS blast furnace process aims at reducing the CO 2 emission of the blast furnace by 50% in two steps: l Decrease of carbon consumption by recycling most of the top gas after CO 2 removal, which requires operating the blast furnace with pure oxygen; l Underground storage of CO2.
“…These technologies were selected by the authors because all of them have the potential to reduce a huge amount of CO 2 through the implementation of one measure or technology, and all have already attained commercialization potential, or are on the verge thereof [20,40]. In addition, these technologies would enable greater independence from coal, such that energy demand can be met by other, less CO 2 -intensive fossil sources like natural gas or directly with emission-free renewable sources such as renewable electrical power or renewable gases like synthetic methane or hydrogen.…”
Section: Alternative Processes For Steelmakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the following selected CO 2 -reduction technologies or routes are evaluated for use in the steel industry: (Section 5.1) Blast furnaces with gas recirculation (BF-GR) [20,21]; (Section 5.2) blast furnaces with carbon capture capability (BF-CC) [20,21]; (Section 5.3) a higher share of steelmaking using EAFs at constant steel production volume [22]; and (Section 5.4) the direct reduction of iron ore using hydrogen as the reduction agent (Circored Process) [23]. These technologies were selected by the authors because all of them have the potential to reduce a huge amount of CO 2 through the implementation of one measure or technology, and all have already attained commercialization potential, or are on the verge thereof [20,40].…”
Section: Alternative Processes For Steelmakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 outlines a blast furnace with BF-GR. Ultra-Low Carbon Dioxide Steelmaking (ULCOS), a consortium of 48 European companies and organizations [41], has developed and evaluated this technology [20,21,42,43]. BF-GR is intended as a replacement of air (hot blast) by nearly pure oxygen and pretreated BF gas.…”
Section: Alternative Processes For Steelmakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the CO 2 reduction potential of a higher share of steelmaking in EAFs at constant steel production is also considered in Section 5.3, because this could lead to a relatively simple reduction in CO 2 emissions without the implementation of new technologies. The analysis of other technologies like the electrochemical cleavage of iron [41] ore are not considered, because these technologies are still at the basic research stage and unlikely to be marketable before 2040 [20]. Furthermore, many possible efficiency measures relating to the whole integrated steelworks, which are described in Santos 2013 [21], for example, are not considered, because one of the targets of this study is to illuminate technologies and measures that lead to large reductions in CO 2 emissions and to determinate the possibility of integrating renewable energies.…”
Section: Alternative Processes For Steelmakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a bid to contribute to filling this gap, this study evaluates blast furnace gas recirculation (BF-GR) [20,21], blast furnace carbon capture (BF-CC) [20,21], the possibility of a higher share of steelmaking being conducted with electrical arc furnaces (EAFs) [22] and the direct reduction of iron ore with renewable hydrogen (H-DR) [23] technologies and methods that not only have the potential to reduce sector CO 2 emissions, but also to shift the steel industry's energy demand away from coal to other energy carriers that can be provided by renewable energies. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to determine whether it is possible to integrate renewably-generated power into the conventional coal-based steel industry via alternative manufacturing technologies or measures and to analyze the effect on CO 2 emissions.…”
This paper analyses some possible means by which renewable power could be integrated into the steel manufacturing process, with techniques such as blast furnace gas recirculation (BF-GR), furnaces that utilize carbon capture, a higher share of electrical arc furnaces (EAFs) and the use of direct reduced iron with hydrogen as reduction agent (H-DR). It is demonstrated that these processes could lead to less dependence on-and ultimately complete independence from-coal. This opens the possibility of providing the steel industry with power and heat by coupling to renewable power generation (sector coupling). In this context, it is shown using the example of Germany that with these technologies, reductions of 47-95% of CO 2 emissions against 1990 levels and 27-95% of primary energy demand against 2008 can be achieved through the integration of 12-274 TWh of renewable electrical power into the steel industry. Thereby, a substantial contribution to reducing CO 2 emissions and fuel demand could be made (although it would fall short of realizing the German government's target of a 50% reduction in power consumption by 2050).
“…These technologies were selected by the authors because all of them have the potential to reduce a huge amount of CO 2 through the implementation of one measure or technology, and all have already attained commercialization potential, or are on the verge thereof [20,40]. In addition, these technologies would enable greater independence from coal, such that energy demand can be met by other, less CO 2 -intensive fossil sources like natural gas or directly with emission-free renewable sources such as renewable electrical power or renewable gases like synthetic methane or hydrogen.…”
Section: Alternative Processes For Steelmakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the following selected CO 2 -reduction technologies or routes are evaluated for use in the steel industry: (Section 5.1) Blast furnaces with gas recirculation (BF-GR) [20,21]; (Section 5.2) blast furnaces with carbon capture capability (BF-CC) [20,21]; (Section 5.3) a higher share of steelmaking using EAFs at constant steel production volume [22]; and (Section 5.4) the direct reduction of iron ore using hydrogen as the reduction agent (Circored Process) [23]. These technologies were selected by the authors because all of them have the potential to reduce a huge amount of CO 2 through the implementation of one measure or technology, and all have already attained commercialization potential, or are on the verge thereof [20,40].…”
Section: Alternative Processes For Steelmakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 outlines a blast furnace with BF-GR. Ultra-Low Carbon Dioxide Steelmaking (ULCOS), a consortium of 48 European companies and organizations [41], has developed and evaluated this technology [20,21,42,43]. BF-GR is intended as a replacement of air (hot blast) by nearly pure oxygen and pretreated BF gas.…”
Section: Alternative Processes For Steelmakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the CO 2 reduction potential of a higher share of steelmaking in EAFs at constant steel production is also considered in Section 5.3, because this could lead to a relatively simple reduction in CO 2 emissions without the implementation of new technologies. The analysis of other technologies like the electrochemical cleavage of iron [41] ore are not considered, because these technologies are still at the basic research stage and unlikely to be marketable before 2040 [20]. Furthermore, many possible efficiency measures relating to the whole integrated steelworks, which are described in Santos 2013 [21], for example, are not considered, because one of the targets of this study is to illuminate technologies and measures that lead to large reductions in CO 2 emissions and to determinate the possibility of integrating renewable energies.…”
Section: Alternative Processes For Steelmakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a bid to contribute to filling this gap, this study evaluates blast furnace gas recirculation (BF-GR) [20,21], blast furnace carbon capture (BF-CC) [20,21], the possibility of a higher share of steelmaking being conducted with electrical arc furnaces (EAFs) [22] and the direct reduction of iron ore with renewable hydrogen (H-DR) [23] technologies and methods that not only have the potential to reduce sector CO 2 emissions, but also to shift the steel industry's energy demand away from coal to other energy carriers that can be provided by renewable energies. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to determine whether it is possible to integrate renewably-generated power into the conventional coal-based steel industry via alternative manufacturing technologies or measures and to analyze the effect on CO 2 emissions.…”
This paper analyses some possible means by which renewable power could be integrated into the steel manufacturing process, with techniques such as blast furnace gas recirculation (BF-GR), furnaces that utilize carbon capture, a higher share of electrical arc furnaces (EAFs) and the use of direct reduced iron with hydrogen as reduction agent (H-DR). It is demonstrated that these processes could lead to less dependence on-and ultimately complete independence from-coal. This opens the possibility of providing the steel industry with power and heat by coupling to renewable power generation (sector coupling). In this context, it is shown using the example of Germany that with these technologies, reductions of 47-95% of CO 2 emissions against 1990 levels and 27-95% of primary energy demand against 2008 can be achieved through the integration of 12-274 TWh of renewable electrical power into the steel industry. Thereby, a substantial contribution to reducing CO 2 emissions and fuel demand could be made (although it would fall short of realizing the German government's target of a 50% reduction in power consumption by 2050).
Das Hochofenverfahren ist das wichtigste Verfahren zur Roheisenerzeugung. Dabei wird die Prozessenergie hauptsächlich über Koks gedeckt. Die Koks-Herstellung ist jedoch mit CO 2 -Frachten und hohen Kosten verbunden. Eine wichtige Maßnahme zur Reduzierung des Kokssatzes und damit der CO 2 -Emissionen sowie Kosten ist das Einblasen von Kohlenstaub über die Blasformen in den Hochofen. Weitere Verbesserungen können durch die Oxycoal+ Technologie erreicht werden. Anhand vereinfachter Energiebilanzen werden die Wirtschaftlichkeit sowie die Minderung der CO 2 -Emissionen für den Nur-Koks-Betrieb des Hochofens, den Betrieb beim Einblasen von Kohlenstaub und den Betrieb bei Anwendung der Oxycoal+ Technologie einander gegenüber gestellt und bewertet.The blast furnace process is the most important process to produce crude iron. The process energy is mainly covered by coke. However, the production of coke is connected with CO 2 emissions and high costs. A significant measure to reduce the coke rate and with it the CO 2 emissions plus costs is pulverized coal injection (PCI) through the tuyeres into the blast furnace. Further improvements can be achieved by using the Oxycoal+ technology. This article compares and shows the cost effectiveness and the decrease of CO 2 emissions with the help of simplified energy balances for the only coke operation of the blast furnace, the operation using PCI and the operation using the Oxycoal+ technology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.