Ukrainian crisis in Japan’s domestic political discourse

Abstract

The Ukrainian crisis, which came into its active phase in February 2022, led to the collapse of Russia’s relations with many countries, and Japan was no exception. The Japanese government expressed strong criticism of Russia’s actions and joined the anti-Russian sanctions with, probably, most vigor, compared to any other Asian nation. This makes the question about the reasons for such course pursued by Tokyo vis-à-vis Russia a particularly timely one. In Russia, there is a widespread opinion that such position held by Tokyo is caused mostly by pressure from the United States. Yet such view seems to be a gross simplification. This article attempts to analyze the positions of various participants of the Japanese foreign policy making process about the events unfolding in Ukraine. It shows that, even though all key parties, irrespective of their political orientation, take a critical stance towards the actions of the Russian Federation, their statements show some nuances reflecting their ideological priorities. For example, the ruling LDP emphasizes solidarity with the US; its junior coalition partner, Komeito, stresses humanitarian aspects and the role of the UN; the Japan Innovation Party criticizes the government for indecisiveness and calls for more active military policy, while the left-wing populist Reiwa Shinsengumi even refused to support the relevant Diet resolution to demonstrate its principled stance to the voters. There are indeed opinions which can arguably be called apologetic towards Russia. However, those holding such opinions are but a minority and are hardly able to alter the position of the government or the Japanese public as a whole. There is a virtual consensus about the issue, and nuances in the positions of major political forces are inconsequential. One would be justified to assume that, under any probable domestic political situation, Tokyo will not change its policy about the matter.

Serbian Energy Sector in a Gap Between East and West

“…The partnership with Russia holds significance because, at present, Serbia exclusively imports natural gas from Russia at highly favorable terms, given its limited domestic production. Russia, along with China, both as permanent members of the United Nations Security Council with the power of veto, supports Serbia's territorial integrity (Seliverstova, 2023). The EU has imposed economic and political sanctions on Russia in response to the ongoing Russia–Ukraine conflict.…”

Africa and the Ukraine Crisis: Exploring Attitudes

“…Naturally, attention is riveted on major non-Western powers such as India (Jagtiani, Wellek, 2022;Kapoor, 2023) and China (Zuenko, 2022;Carlson, 2022). There are also works on the positions of various small and medium-sized states (Vorontsov, 2022;Dharmaputra, 2022;Nelidov, 2022;Nagy and Ngyen, 2023), including African ones (Azikiwe, 2022;Loshkarev, 2022;Gachicheladze, 2022;Shheglovin, 2022;Balmasov, 2022, Shafie, 2022, where the case-study method prevails.…”