2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UGCT: New X-ray radiography and tomography facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
113
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scanner is similar to the one as described in Masschaele et al [16] and used in Van den Bulcke et al [17,18]. It has a generic in-house developed CT scanner control software platform [19] that allows full control of the scanner hardware.…”
Section: X-ray Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scanner is similar to the one as described in Masschaele et al [16] and used in Van den Bulcke et al [17,18]. It has a generic in-house developed CT scanner control software platform [19] that allows full control of the scanner hardware.…”
Section: X-ray Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless the results demonstrate the quantitative correctness of the simulations both for the measured reconstructed attenuation coefficients and for the noise in the reconstructions. A similar experiment was performed at the scanner described in [1] and a maximum deviation of 6.5% was observed. Note that, as previously mentioned, the effect of the secondary spot can have an influence on the result.…”
Section: Comparison Of Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Figure 8(a) shows a projection image of an Al sphere (6 mm diameter) taken at the micro-CT scanner described in [1]. Figure 8(b) shows the effect of the secondary spot on the projection image.…”
Section: Comparison Of Transmission Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high brilliance of synchrotron radiation results in a clear superiority in terms of achievable spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (Baruchel et al, 2006), but the number of synchrotron facilities is limited and the operational cost is very high. Lab-based micro-CT systems (Jakubek et al, 2006;Masschaele et al, 2007) on the other hand have lower X-ray flux but are more cost-efficient. Nowadays, a large number of desktop CT systems exist (Sasov and Van Dyck, 1998) which are commercially available, making micro-CT accessible for a large number of researchers.…”
Section: Towards Micro-ctmentioning
confidence: 99%