Uganda’s increasing dependence on development partner’s support for immunization – a five year resource tracking study (2012 – 2016)

Abstract

Background In Uganda, there are persistent weaknesses in obtaining accurate, reliable and complete data on local and external investments in immunization to guide planning, financing, and resource mobilization. This study aimed to measure and describe the financial envelope for immunization from 2012 to 2016 and analyze expenditures at sub-national level. Methods The Systems of Health Accounts (SHA) 2011 methodology was used to quantify and map the resource envelope for immunization. Data was collected at national and sub-national levels from public and external sources of immunization. Data were coded, categorized and disaggregated by expenditure on immunization activities using the SHA 2011. Results Over the five-year period, funding for immunization increased fourfold from US$20.4 million in 2012 to US$ 85.6 million in 2016. The Ugandan government was the main contributor (55%) to immunization resources from 2012 to 2014 however, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance contributed the majority (59%) of the resources to immunization in 2015 and 2016. Majority (66%) of the funds were managed by the National Medical Stores. Over the five-year period, 80% of the funds allocated to immunization activities were spent on facility based routine immunization (expenditure on human resources and outreaches). At sub-national level, districts allocated 15% of their total annual resources to immunization to support supervision of lower health facilities and distribution of vaccines. Health facilities spent 5.5% of their total annual resources on immunization to support outreaches. Conclusion Development partner support has aided the improvement of vaccine coverage and increased access to vaccines however, there is an increasing dependence on this support for a critical national program raising sustainability concerns alongside other challenges like being off-budget and unpredictable. To ensure financial sustainability, there is need to operationalize the immunization fund, advocate and mobilize additional resources for immunization from the Government of Uganda and the private sector, increase the reliability of resources for immunization as well as leverage on health financing reforms like the National Health Insurance.

Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts

“…Uganda’s health system comprises of both the private and public sector in terms of infrastructure, ownership and delivery of health services [ 39 , 40 ]. The health system is decentralized and hierarchical with seven levels starting from the household/village level and culminating at national referral institutions and the Ministry of Health [ 41 ].…”

“…However, the latest figures report private expenditure as a percentage of Current Health Expenditure (CHE) to be 41% and out-of-pocket expenditure at 38% [ 43 ]. Health financing remains a key national challenge and the recommended Abuja target 15% of the GDP apportioned to health [ 40 , 44 , 45 ] has never been achieved, with average health sector allocations ranging from 6 to 9% [ 45 , 46 ]. In particular, the low funding for Uganda’s healthcare system continues to create an ongoing challenge of insufficient health workforce numbers [ 47 ] which has sometimes been mitigated by task shifting since 1918 [ 48 ] and which the evidence shows to have improved quality of care in the treatment of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) programs as well as malaria [ 49 – 51 ].…”

A critical review of literature on health financing reforms in Uganda – progress, challenges and opportunities for achieving UHC

“…Firstly, OOP payment is associated with inequity in access, catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment 22 , 25 , 28 , 39 , 50 , 52 . Secondly, development partners' funding has issues of unpredictability and fragmentation 27 , 51 , 53 – 55 .…”

Gaps in measles vaccination coverage in Kasese district, Western Uganda: results of a qualitative evaluation

“…Participants reported negotiating credit with local private transport companies including commercial motorcycle drivers, while awaiting the release of PHC funds for use as a refund. According to Ministry of Health EPI guidelines, the transportation of vaccines from the district vaccine store to lower health facilities is the mandate of the district health office which can be achieved if transport means and fuel is availed through PHC funds [ 22 ]. Our study revealed that this transportation of vaccines was affected due to lack of available transport facilities.…”