Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts

Abstract

Background The negative impact of COVID-19 on population health outcomes raises critical questions on health system preparedness and resilience, especially in resource-limited settings. This study examined healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts. Methods A cross sectional, mixed-method descriptive study in 17 health facilities in 7 districts from 4 major regions. Total sample size was 485 including > 370 health care workers (HCWs). HCW knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) was assessed by using a pre-validated questionnaire. The quantitative data was processed and analysed using SPSS 26, and statistical significance assumed at p < 0.05 for all statistical tests. Bloom's cutoff of 80% was used to determine threshold for sufficient knowledge level and practices with scores classified as high (80.0–100.0%), average (60.0–79.0%) and low (≤ 59.0%). HCW implementation experiences and key stakeholder opinions were further explored qualitatively using interviews which were audio-recorded, coded and thematically analysed. Results On average 71% of HCWs were knowledgeable on the various aspects of COVID-19, although there is a wide variation in knowledge. Awareness of symptoms ranked highest among 95% (p value < 0.0001) of HCWs while awareness of the criteria for intubation for COVID-19 patients ranked lowest with only 35% (p value < 0.0001). Variations were noted on falsehoods about COVID-19 causes, prevention and treatment across Central (p value < 0.0356) and West Nile (p value < 0.0161) regions. Protective practices include adequate ventilation, virtual meetings and HCW training. Deficient practices were around psychosocial and lifestyle support, remote working and contingency plans for HCW safety. The work environment has immensely changed with increased demands on the amount of work, skills and variation in nature of work. HCWs reported moderate control over their work environment but with a high level of support from supervisors (88%) and colleagues (93%). Conclusions HCWs preparedness is inadequate in some aspects. Implementation of healthcare interventions is constrained by the complexity of Uganda’s health system design, top-down approach of the national response to COVID-19 and longstanding health system bottlenecks. We recommend continuous information sharing on COVID-19, a design review with capacity strengthening at all health facility levels and investing in community-facing strategies.

Analysis of the current situation and factors influencing bullying in junior high schools in backward areas of Western, China & A case study of Qingyang City in Gasu

“…In terms of the manifestations of school bullying, in this study, the frequency of occurrence, from highest to lowest, was verbal bullying (40.7%), relational bullying (28.7%), physical bullying (28.4%), and cyberbullying (17.2%). These results are generally consistent with the findings reported by Ru et al [ 17 ] in Jiangxi Province; however, the prevalence of various forms of bullying was much higher than in the study conducted by Yang et al [ 18 ] in a certain region of central China. This indicates that, relative to eastern urban areas, the prevalence of school bullying in Qingyang City is closer to that of northern rural areas.…”

Slum Dwellers’ Adherence to COVID-19 Guidelines: Application of the COM-B Model to Barriers and Facilitators of Behavioural Change in Uganda’s Urban Slums

“…Among vulnerable communities like refugees and urban slum dwellers, adherence to preventive guidelines were largely undermined through physical-structural realities which include living in crowded, impoverished setting and the lack of essential items like soap, water for handwashing, face masks and sanitizers [12]. More than 60% of Kampala -Uganda's urban population dwells in informal settlements most of which are slums [13] being a capital city, Kampala was the epicentre of not only COVID transmissions from the onset but also the prevention and mitigation effort of the national response [14]. The COM-B Model Public health emergencies like the Ebola outbreaks in West Africa and Uganda, or pandemics like SARs and COVID-19, often require a behavioural shift within populations to mitigate them [15].…”

“…As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve globally and nationally, it is critical to better understand the CEI, achieve buy-in, ownership and aim to achieve impactful implementation in support of national policy. In addition, a more equitable HSS across all levels of Uganda's healthcare system is required -especially at the grassroot and among lower-level health units to enable a meaningful contribution to effective prevention and case management at all levels [14]. Communities should be held accountable, allowed space to implement with their capacity to monitor and assess implementation progress enhanced.…”

Risk factors for disruptions in tuberculosis care in Uganda during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…A second 42-day lockdown was also instituted in April of 2021 with comparable, albeit less restrictive policies. During the initial lockdown period and initial phases of the pandemic TB testing platforms were repurposed to test for COVID-19 and TB clinic staff were affected by transportation restrictions and were reassigned to COVID-19 units leading to reports of understaffing [14,15]. Clinics also employed strategies to ensure continuation of essential TB services which included: financial incentives for healthcare workers, PPE distribution and dispensing medications for multiple months during refills [16].…”