1888
DOI: 10.1515/crll.1888.103.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ueber einen Satz von Dirichlet.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1906
1906
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1. , where gcd(a, 2b, c) = 1, infinitely many of them are representable by any given linear form Mx + N, with gcd(M, N) = 1, provided a, b, c, M, N are such that the linear and quadratic forms can represent the same number. Meyer [24] gave a complete proof of this result, whereas Mertens [23] gave an elementary proof of the same. We conclude by this result that there exist infinitely many primes p of the form p ≡ 3 (mod 4) such that x 2 − dy 2 = p. As d ≡ 2 (mod 4), so that both x and y are odd.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1. , where gcd(a, 2b, c) = 1, infinitely many of them are representable by any given linear form Mx + N, with gcd(M, N) = 1, provided a, b, c, M, N are such that the linear and quadratic forms can represent the same number. Meyer [24] gave a complete proof of this result, whereas Mertens [23] gave an elementary proof of the same. We conclude by this result that there exist infinitely many primes p of the form p ≡ 3 (mod 4) such that x 2 − dy 2 = p. As d ≡ 2 (mod 4), so that both x and y are odd.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%