1898
DOI: 10.1002/andp.18983021106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ueber die Grenzen des festen Zustandes II.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1932
1932
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plank (21) further states, "In connection with particularly accelerated freezing, changes in the distribution of internal water appear smaller than in produce frozen at a slow speed." Thus was developed the theory of speed of freezing which indicates the desirability of freezing rapidly in line with the findings of Tammann (26) in 1898 who stated that the number of crystallization centers developing in undercooled fluids depends directly upon the rapidity with which the temperature of the fluid is lowered; and with Fortuyn (9) in 1915, who stated that quick-freezing does not cause any rupture of the sarcolemma as does slow-freezing.…”
Section: Early Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Plank (21) further states, "In connection with particularly accelerated freezing, changes in the distribution of internal water appear smaller than in produce frozen at a slow speed." Thus was developed the theory of speed of freezing which indicates the desirability of freezing rapidly in line with the findings of Tammann (26) in 1898 who stated that the number of crystallization centers developing in undercooled fluids depends directly upon the rapidity with which the temperature of the fluid is lowered; and with Fortuyn (9) in 1915, who stated that quick-freezing does not cause any rupture of the sarcolemma as does slow-freezing.…”
Section: Early Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(red solid line): eq ; (black open squares): Akella and Kennedy; (red open squares): Bridgman; (black open circles): Block; (black solid diamonds): Azreg-Aïnou et al. ; (black cross symbols): Nagaoka and Makita; (black plus symbols): Yokoyama; (black open triangles): Sun et al; (black solid triangles): Tammann; (black solid circles): Osugi et al; (red solid circles): Makita and Takagi; (red solid triangles): Figuière et al; (black solid squares): Trappeniers; (red solid squares): Deffet; (red cross symbols): Pruzan; (red plus symbols): Ghelfenstein; (dashed lines): validity limit of the model developed by Thol et al Melting temperatures have been calculated coupling eq and the model developed by Thol et al…”
Section: Comparison Of the New Equation With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best object for studying this influence is dehydrated chabasite, as I have shown (93). Tammann has called attention to the fact that chabasite belongs to a class of minerals which remain transparent after dehydration (94). Brill has established that the lattice of chabasite is not changed by dehydration ; the pores which are produced by dehydration are therefore of quite extraordinary regularity.…”
Section: Importance Of the Size Of Poresmentioning
confidence: 99%