2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-017-0543-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UAV Obstacle Avoidance Algorithm Based on Ellipsoid Geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. 32, an OA algorithm is proposed that locates and designs paths via ellipses that encircle obstacles in the path. Fiorini and Shiller (33) introduced the concept of For calculating the desired distance between all agents except the leader:…”
Section: B Geometric Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. 32, an OA algorithm is proposed that locates and designs paths via ellipses that encircle obstacles in the path. Fiorini and Shiller (33) introduced the concept of For calculating the desired distance between all agents except the leader:…”
Section: B Geometric Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle swarm optimization fuzzy control method [10,11], artificial potential tangent vector method [12], improved APF method based on case reasoning [13] and other applications in path planning of mobile robots provide experience for UAV path planning. The ellipsoid is used as the restricted area of the obstacle, and the geometric characteristics of the ellipsoid are used to search the path of obstacle avoidance, so as to realize the obstacle avoidance of UAV [14]. The obstacle avoidance beetle antenna search (OABAS) algorithm is a new path planning algorithm based on the biological heuristic algorithm, which is applied to the global path planning of UAV to achieve obstacle avoidance [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the missions, it is essential for autonomous robots to detect and avoid various obstacles while maneuver in unknown cluttered environments safely. Numerous methods have been proposed and adapted successfully to different robots [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. However, conventional methods may impose intensive computational demand [ 6 , 7 ] and are often built upon a set of assumptions that are likely not to be satisfied in practice [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%