Typology of organizational innovation components: building blocks to improve access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations

Abstract

Background Achieving equity of access to primary healthcare requires organizations to implement innovations tailored to the specific needs and abilities of vulnerable populations. However, designing pro-vulnerable innovations is challenging without knowledge of the range of possible innovations tailored to vulnerable populations’ needs. To better support decision-makers, we aimed to develop a typology of pro-vulnerable organizational innovation components – akin to “building blocks” that could be combined in different ways into new complex innovations or added to existing organizational processes to improve access to primary healthcare. Methods To develop the typology, we used data from a previously conducted a) scoping review (2000–2014, searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, citation tracking, n = 90 articles selected), and b) environmental scan (2014, online survey via social networks, n = 240 innovations). We conducted a typological analysis of the data. Our initial typology yielded 48 components, classified according to accessibility dimensions from the Patient-Centred Accessibility Framework. The initial typology was then field-tested for relevance and usability by health system stakeholders and refined from 2014 to 2018 (e.g., combined similar components, excluded non-organizational components). Results The selected articles (n = 90 studies) and survey responses (n = 240 innovations) were mostly from the USA, Canada, Australia and the UK. Innovations targeted populations with various vulnerabilities (e.g., low income, chronic illness, Indigenous, homeless, migrants, refugees, ethnic minorities, uninsured, marginalized groups, mental illness, etc.). Our final typology had 18 components of organizational innovations, which principally addressed Availability & Accommodation (7/18), Approachability (6/18), and Acceptability (3/18). Components included navigation & information, community health worker, one-stop-shop, case management, group visits, defraying costs, primary healthcare brokerage, etc. Conclusions This typology offers a comprehensive menu of potential components that can help inform the design of pro-vulnerable organizational innovations. Component classification according to the accessibility dimensions of the Patient-Centred Accessibility Framework is useful to help target access needs. Components can be combined into complex innovations or added to existing organizational processes to meet the access needs of vulnerable populations in specific contexts.

How Are Non-Medical Settlement Service Organizations Supporting Access to Healthcare and Mental Health Services for Immigrants: A Scoping Review

“…Despite the challenges, these organizations are uniquely positioned ‘on the ground’, where they are able to identify the healthcare needs of immigrant populations within the community and closely work with clients (e.g., via community health workers) to address health concerns (e.g., education programming internal to the settlement organization), support healthcare system navigation, provide referrals to health services, and partner/collaborate with health sector institutions to delivery health programs and initiatives [ 44 ]. These functions and roles are consistent with literature outlining successful organizational ‘building blocks’ to improve access to primary healthcare for marginalized populations [ 45 ].…”

Health System Response to Refugees’ and Migrants’ Health in Iran: A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis and Policy Recommendations

“…Inter-organizational/inter-sectoral care pathways, group visits instead of individual care, community health workers, and document-issuance facilitation can all be used as interventions to enhance awareness of health plans and benefits. It will significantly reduce the barriers to access those migrants face as a result of the approachability [ 15 ]. In addition, simplifying financial processes for migrants, for example, innovative ways for revenue generation, paying the insurance premiums payment in installments, simplifying the enrollment procedure [ 32 , 22 ], integrating enrollment sources, changing the enrollment unit, and improving premium collection approaches can help them to manage their spiraling expenses [ 33 ].…”

“…In the final phase, three researchers independently categorized the results of the first two phases into the structures of SWOT dimensions and Levesque’s conceptual framework [ 15 , 16 ]. The framework presents a comprehensive assessment of healthcare access, which includes variables such as approachability, acceptability, availability/accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness.…”

Exploring New Models for Implementing Sustainable Integrated Health Access for People in Vulnerable Positions: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Multiple Case Study

“…Exploring new models for implementing sustainable integrated health access for people in vulnerable positions: Research protocol for a mixed methods multiple case study Sofie Buch Mejsner 1 PhD; Jane Aslaug 2 ; Mickael Bech 3 ; Viola Burau 1 ; Dorte Mark 4 ; Kathrine Vixø 5 ; Caroline Louise Westergaard 5 ; Michael Fehsenfeld 1 1 Aarhus University, Department of Public Health Aarhus DK 2 Viborg Municipality, Social, Health & Care Viborg DK 3 University of Southern Denmark, Department of Political Science Odense DK 4 Central Denmark Region, Central Regional Psychiatry Viborg DK 5 The Danish Center for Social Science Research (VIVE) Copenhagen DK…”

“…People in vulnerable situations are individuals who lack personal, material, and social resources to tackle the challenges of getting the right health and social care when in need [5]. They are a highly heterogeneous group and include people experiencing homelessness, people with disabilities, people with limited social support, and those with complex health conditions.…”