2013
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2013.15398abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Types of learning in complex technological innovations

Abstract: This paper examines how the knowledge base of a firm affects the generation of combinatorial innovations. Recent insights in the literature on organizational learning suggest that the degree of integration among bodies of specialized technological knowledge affects the outcomes of the innovation process. However, the literature is still in its infancy in terms of the relationship between the structure of the knowledge base and the degree of technological complexity of innovations. The present study aims at und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach to distinguish high and low values of a variable is widely used in the economics and management literature (see, e.g. Alkaersig et al, 2013;Eichengreen & Gupta, 2016;Grjebine & Tripier, 2015;Shi et al, 2019)…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach to distinguish high and low values of a variable is widely used in the economics and management literature (see, e.g. Alkaersig et al, 2013;Eichengreen & Gupta, 2016;Grjebine & Tripier, 2015;Shi et al, 2019)…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our study suggests a particular way of conceptualizing and measuring the rareness of a patented technology and tests it in the context of nanotechnology. Alternative conceptualization and operationalization as well as empirical testing in different industry contexts may lead to different findings (e.g., Alkaersig et al., 2013). Future research that employs multiple operationalization methods applied to our context or other industries would shed light on the scope of applicability of different rareness measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%