Types de sites universitaires et appropriation de l'espace.

Abstract

Notre recherche se propose d'évaluer l'impact du type de site universitaire (site « intra-muros », intégré dans un campus ou entité autonome) sur le processus d'appropriation spatiale mis en œuvre par les étudiants d'Institut Universitaire de Technologie (IUT). Trois cent vingt et un étudiants ont répondu à un questionnaire d'appropriation de l'espace et les résultats obtenus mettent en évidence l'impact différencié du type de site universitaire sur les trois dimensions de notre outil (Connaissance de l'Environnement, Libre Circulation et Stimulation de l'Environnement).

Workplace attachment, workspace appropriation, and job satisfaction

“…(a) The French version (Rioux, 2004) of the Space Appropriation scale (A-E) drawn up by Morval and Judge, 2000. There are three subscales: Knowledge of the environment (six items), Free movement (three items), and Stimulation of the Environment (four items). It has been used with teachers (Barbillon, Moch and Rioux, 2006) and students (Rioux, 2008), and its psychometric properties are entirely satisfactory (GFI = .93, AGFI = .93, Chi square (df = 78) = 435.38, RMSEA = .07).…”

“…(a) La versión francesa (Rioux, 2004) de la Space Appropriation Scale (A-E) (Escala de Apropiación del Espacio) elaborada por Morval y Judge (2000). Se compone de tres subescalas: Conocimiento del entorno (seis ítems), Libre movimiento (tres ítems) y Estimulación del entorno (cuatro ítems).…”

A New Concept in Our Relationship with Time:Time Appropriation

“…We examine time appropriation in terms of recurrent time units (hour, day, week, year) and time regions (past, present and future), and we address the appropriation processes related to these time periods in the sub-dimensions of a) identi cation, b) meaning, c) emotion, d) ownership, e) transformativeness, f) sociability and g) physical environment in the present study. We have prepared these dimensions based on the conceptual de nition of the appropriation (Korosec- Serfaty, 1976Serfaty, , 1984Serfaty, , 1985 and the way some empirical studies addressed the concept (e.g., Brunson et al, 2001;Morval & Judge, 2000;Rioux, 2004;Rioux et al, 2017). New sub-dimensions (e.g., transformativeness) were even added to the conceptual map by making new connections between the de nition of the concept and the participants' responses.…”