2017
DOI: 10.1177/1352458517728343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-year results from a phase 2 extension study of oral amiselimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis

Abstract: Background:Amiselimod, an oral selective sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor modulator, suppressed disease activity dose-dependently without clinically relevant bradyarrhythmia in a 24-week phase 2, placebo-controlled study in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.Objective:To assess safety and efficacy of amiselimod over 96 weeks.Methods:After completing the core study, patients on amiselimod continued at the same dose, whereas those on placebo were randomised 1:1:1 to amiselimod 0.1, 0.2 or 0.4 mg for anothe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, S1P 4 , as discussed previously in this review, is predominantly expressed in lymphoid tissues [88,95], and ligation and its subsequent signaling are involved in marking time regarding proliferation [286,287], a reduction of effector cytokines secreted [286,287], and migration of lymphocytes [288,289]. It is worth noting that amiselimod displays a very safe risk profile [290][291][292], while it is too early to consistently assess this for etrasimod [293]. Their application and/or investigation regarding their future therapeutic exploitability in neurological conditions should find due consideration soon.…”
Section: Insights Into Current and Future Therapeutic Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In this regard, S1P 4 , as discussed previously in this review, is predominantly expressed in lymphoid tissues [88,95], and ligation and its subsequent signaling are involved in marking time regarding proliferation [286,287], a reduction of effector cytokines secreted [286,287], and migration of lymphocytes [288,289]. It is worth noting that amiselimod displays a very safe risk profile [290][291][292], while it is too early to consistently assess this for etrasimod [293]. Their application and/or investigation regarding their future therapeutic exploitability in neurological conditions should find due consideration soon.…”
Section: Insights Into Current and Future Therapeutic Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Evaluation of ozanimod has involved a placebo-controlled and active-controlled (vs interferon beta-1a) combined RMS Phase 2/3 trial (RADIANCE) [12,138,139] and an active-controlled Phase 3 trial versus interferon beta-1a (SUNBEAM) in patients with RMS [11,140,141], while the assessment of ceralifimod in patients with RRMS has involved a placebo-controlled Phase 2 study (DreaMS) [142]. Ponesimod has been assessed in a placebocontrolled Phase 2b study (NCT01006265) [67], and a completed active-controlled Phase 3 trial versus teriflunomide (OPTIMUM) in patients with RRMS (NCT02425644), while the placebo-controlled Phase 2 MOMENTUM study and extension have evaluated amiselimod in patients with RRMS [143,144].…”
Section: Clinical Efficacy Of S1pr Modulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20] Other S1P receptor modulators are in clinical development as potential therapies, including ozanimod in multiple sclerosis and UC, [21][22][23] ponesimod in multiple sclerosis and psoriasis, 24,25 and amiselimod in multiple sclerosis and Crohn's disease. [26][27][28] Fingolimod, a first-generation S1P receptor modulator, interacts nonselectively with S1P isoforms 1 through 5. 9,14 This lack of selectivity has been suggested to contribute to some of the adverse events (AEs) observed in patients treated with fingolimod, including pulmonary fibrosis and elevation of liver enzymes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%