Mellitus) study evaluated efficacy and safety of lorcaserin for weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes. Secondary objectives included evaluations of glycemic control, lipids, blood pressure, and quality of life. This 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 604 patients 1:1:1 to placebo, lorcaserin 10 mg once daily (QD) or lorcaserin 10 mg twice daily (BID). Patients were treated with metformin, a sulfonylurea (SFU) or both; had glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) 7-10%; were 18-65 years old; and had BMI 27-45 kg/m 2 . Patients received diet and exercise counseling. Safety monitoring included serial echocardiograms. Mean (± SD) age was 52.7 ± 8.7; 54.2% were women; 60.5% were white, 20.9% were African American, and 13.8% were Hispanic. Mean (± SD) weight was 103.6 ± 17.8 kg; BMI was 36.0 ± 4.5 kg/m 2 . Most patients (91.7%) took metformin; 50.2% took a SFU. More patients lost ≥5% body weight with lorcaserin BID (37.5%; P < 0.001) or lorcaserin QD (44.7%; P < 0.001) vs. placebo (16.1%; modified intent to treat (MITT)/last observation carried forward (LOCF)). Least square mean (± SEM) weight change was −4.5 ± 0.35% with lorcaserin BID and −5.0 ± 0.5% with lorcaserin QD vs. −1.5 ± 0.36% with placebo (P < 0.001 for each). HbA 1c decreased 0.9 ± 0.06 with lorcaserin BID, 1.0 ± 0.09 with lorcaserin QD, and 0.4 ± 0.06 with placebo (P < 0.001 for each); fasting glucose decreased 27.4 ± 2.5 mg/dl, −28.4 ± 3.8 mg/dl, and 11.9 ± 2.5 mg/dl, respectively (P < 0.001 for each). Symptomatic hypoglycemia occurred in 7.4% of patients on lorcaserin BID, 10.5% on lorcaserin QD, and 6.3% on placebo. Common adverse events were headache, back pain, nasopharyngitis, and nausea. Lorcaserin was associated with significant weight loss and improvement in glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.Obesity ( articles intervention and PreventionThe BLOOM-DM (Behavioral Modification and Lorcaserin for Obesity and Overweight Management in Diabetes Mellitus) study had as its main objective the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of lorcaserin for weight loss in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin and/or a sulfonylurea (SFU). Secondarily, the impact of lorcaserin on glycemic control was evaluated. Methods and Procedures study designThe study was conducted at 58 academic and private research sites in the United States between 27 December 2007 and 9 August 2010 under the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Institutional review boards reviewed and approved the protocol for each research site. All patients provided written informed consent before participation in the trial.The overall objective of the 1-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lorcaserin for weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes when administered in conjunction with a lifestyle modification program. The prespecified coprimary endpoints were: (i) the proportion of patients achieving ≥5% reduction in baseline body weight at the end of 1 year, (ii) change in weight, and (iii) t...

No abstract

Lorcaserin reduces body weight through reduced EI, not altered EE or RQ.

Background and Aims Etrasimod is an oral, selective, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator. In a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (OASIS), etrasimod 2 mg provided significant benefit versus placebo and was generally well tolerated. This open-label extension (OLE) evaluated safety and efficacy of etrasimod for up to 52 weeks. Methods In OASIS, 156 patients received etrasimod 1 mg, etrasimod 2 mg, or placebo once-daily for 12 weeks. After completing OASIS, patients could enrol in the OLE and receive etrasimod 2 mg for an additional 34–40 weeks. Results 118 patients enrolled in the OLE; 112 patients received etrasimod 2 mg at any point and were evaluated for safety and efficacy. A total of 92 (82%) patients who received etrasimod 2 mg in the OLE completed the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 60% (67/112) of patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg at any time, most commonly worsening ulcerative colitis and anaemia; 94% of adverse events were mild/moderate. At end of treatment, 64% of patients met the criteria for clinical response, 33% for clinical remission, and 43% for endoscopic improvement. Week 12 clinical response, clinical remission, or endoscopic improvement was maintained to end of treatment in 85%, 60%, or 69% of patients, respectively. Steroid-free clinical remission occurred in 22% of overall patients. Conclusions In this long-term extension study, etrasimod 2 mg demonstrated a favourable safety profile. Most patients with clinical response, clinical remission, or endoscopic improvement at Week 12 maintained that status to end of treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers NCT02447302, NCT02536404.

PurposeThis phase 2 study was designed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of immediate-release orally administered ralinepag, a selective, non-prostanoid prostacyclin receptor agonist with a 24-h terminal half-life, compared to placebo in adult patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).Methods61 PAH patients who were receiving standard care, including mono or dual PAH-targeted background therapy were randomised 2:1 to ralinepag (n=40) or placebo (n=21). The starting dose of ralinepag was 10 μg twice daily. Dosage was then up-titrated as tolerated over the course of the 9-week dose-titration period, to a maximum total daily dose of 600 μg (300 μg twice daily). The primary efficacy end-point was the absolute change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from baseline to week 22. Additional end-points included percentage change in PVR from baseline, other haemodynamic parameters, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and safety and tolerability.ResultsRalinepag significantly decreased PVR by 163.9 dyn·s·cm−5 compared to an increase of 0.7 dyn·s·cm−5 with placebo (p=0.02); the least-squares mean change from baseline PVR was −29.8% compared with placebo (p=0.03). 6MWD increased from baseline by 36.2 m with ralinepag and 29.4 m with placebo (p=0.90). Serious adverse events occurred in 10% of ralinepag patients and 29% of placebo patients. Study discontinuations occurred in 13% of ralinepag patients and 10% of placebo patients.SummaryRalinepag reduced PVR compared with placebo in PAH patients on mono (41%) or dual combination (59%) background therapy.