Two-year bond strengths of “all-in-one” adhesives to dentine

Walter, Ricardo; Swift, Edward J.; Nagaoka, Hiroko; Chung, Yunro; Bartholomew, Whitley; Braswell, Krista; Pereira, Patrícia

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.003

Cited by 37 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, several other factors can adversely affect the clinical retention of coating materials on the root surface. It was reported that bonded interfaces produced by adhesive systems degraded for long time in vivo due to hydrolysis or enzymatic degradation of dentin organic phase 38) . Therefore, further studies should be carried out to evaluate the long-term reliability of the root surface coating materials under the clinical setting.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resistance of dentin coating materials against abrasion by toothbrush

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thin-film coating of root dentin surface by all-in-one adhesives has been shown to be an effective option to prevent root surface caries. The purpose of this study was to investigate the wear resistance against toothbrush abrasion of two all-in-one coating materials; Shield Force (SF) and Hybrid Coat (HC). Bovine dentin surfaces were covered with one of the coating materials; SF or HC. After storage in water for 24 h, the testing surface was subjected to the toothbrush abrasion test up to 50,000 cycles either in water or toothpaste slurry. The remaining thickness of the coating material was measured using SEM. Toothpaste slurry significantly increased rate of tooth brush abrasion of the coating materials. While SF and HC wore at a similar pace under toothbrush abrasion, SF had a thicker coat and could protect dentin longer, up to 50,000 cycles.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resistance of dentin coating materials against abrasion by toothbrush

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…And that is what was observed in this study as well as others. [10][11][12][13][14] One aspect in the design of this study that was specifically done to add more power to the results was pairing substrate samples. With any study, whether it is in vitro or in vivo, there will always be confounding factors, such as age of the test tooth, storage media and duration, cultural and environmental factors of the person from whom the tooth was obtained, and sample-processing procedures.…”

Section: Difference Between All Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Enamel and Dentin Shear Bond Strengths of Current Dental Bonding Adhesives From Three Bond Generations

Meharry

Moazzami²,

2013

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The strong hydrophobicity of the nano-layered structure helps to protect the hybrid layer against hydrolytic bond degradation processes [11]. This results in the well-documented favorable in-vitro durability of dentin bonds produced by 10-MDP based adhesives [12][13][14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%