1995
DOI: 10.2307/40285687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Ways of Defining Tonal Strength and Implications for Recognition of Tone Series

Abstract: This article reports an experiment that tested whether two types of tonally strong tone series are equally well recognized. The experiment also tested whether tonally weak series are less well recognized than tonally strong series, tonally strong series being transformed into tonally weak series by changing from the ionian to the phrygian church mode. The results show that (1) both types of tonally strong series are, on average, equally well recognized and (2) series presented in the phrygian mode are less wel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we have derived tonal magnitude as a power transformation of the standardized key profile, on reflection it is clear that tonal magnitude is in many ways comparable to the more familiar concept of tonal strength. Research on tonal strength has occupied a central place in work on musical cognition, with such investigations extensively studying, for example, the consequences of varying tonal strength on the processing of and memory for musical passages (e.g., Croonen, 1994Croonen, , 1995Cuddy, Cohen, & Mewhort, 1981;Cuddy, Cohen, & Miller, 1979;Cuddy & Lyons, 1981;Dowling, 1978Dowling, , 1991. In addition, this work has identified characteristics that make a passage tonally strong, with music heard as tonally strong if it (a) is diatonic, in that it is composed primarily of pitches of the diatonic set; (b) begins and ends on the tonic; and (c) exhibits cadential structure (e.g., contains a sequence of chords built on Pitch Class 0, followed by Pitch Class 7, and ending on Pitch Class 0).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we have derived tonal magnitude as a power transformation of the standardized key profile, on reflection it is clear that tonal magnitude is in many ways comparable to the more familiar concept of tonal strength. Research on tonal strength has occupied a central place in work on musical cognition, with such investigations extensively studying, for example, the consequences of varying tonal strength on the processing of and memory for musical passages (e.g., Croonen, 1994Croonen, , 1995Cuddy, Cohen, & Mewhort, 1981;Cuddy, Cohen, & Miller, 1979;Cuddy & Lyons, 1981;Dowling, 1978Dowling, , 1991. In addition, this work has identified characteristics that make a passage tonally strong, with music heard as tonally strong if it (a) is diatonic, in that it is composed primarily of pitches of the diatonic set; (b) begins and ends on the tonic; and (c) exhibits cadential structure (e.g., contains a sequence of chords built on Pitch Class 0, followed by Pitch Class 7, and ending on Pitch Class 0).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it was assumed that prototypic instances of tonality could be created (Cuddy, 1991;Jones, 1981Jones, , 1982Jones, , 1991Krumhansl, 1990a). Second, it was assumed that four or five distinct levels (at least) could be discriminated along a tonality continuum (Cuddy, Cohen, & Mewhort, 1981; see also Croonen, 1994;Dowling, 1991). The sense of tonality does not merely involve a categorical distinction between tonality and absence of tonality.…”
Section: Stage 1-music Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%