Since the pioneering prediction of surface melting by Michael Faraday, it has been widely accepted that thin water layers, called quasi-liquid layers (QLLs), homogeneously and completely wet ice surfaces. Contrary to this conventional wisdom, here we both theoretically and experimentally demonstrate that QLLs have more than two wetting states and that there is a first-order wetting transition between them. Furthermore, we find that QLLs are born not only under supersaturated conditions, as recently reported, but also at undersaturation, but QLLs are absent at equilibrium. This means that QLLs are a metastable transient state formed through vapor growth and sublimation of ice, casting a serious doubt on the conventional understanding presupposing the spontaneous formation of QLLs in ice-vapor equilibrium. We propose a simple but general physical model that consistently explains these aspects of surface melting and QLLs. Our model shows that a unique interfacial potential solely controls both the wetting and thermodynamic behavior of QLLs.surface melting | quasi-liquid layer | advanced optical microscopy | pseudo-partial wetting | wetting transition I n general, surfaces and interfaces yield unique phase transitions absent in the bulk (1-5). Surface melting (or premelting) of ice (3, 4) is one typical and classical example that has been known since the first prediction by Michael Faraday in 1842 (6). He hypothesized that thin water layers, now called quasi-liquid layers (QLLs), wet ice crystal surfaces even at a temperature below the melting point. Since then, this phenomenon has attracted considerable attention not only because of its importance in the fundamental understanding of melting (a solid-toliquid transition) itself but also as a link to a diverse set of natural phenomena in subzero environments: making snowballs, slippage on ice surfaces, frost heave, recrystallization and coarsening of ice grains, morphological change of snow crystals, electrification of thunderclouds, and ozone-depleting reactions (3, 4, 7). Furthermore, it is now recognized that surface melting is not specific to ice but rather is universally seen in a wide range of crystalline surfaces such as metals, semiconductors, ceramics, rare gases, and organic and colloidal systems (8-12). Its underlying physics is therefore also inseparable from material science and technology.Although the origin of surface melting, including the nature of QLLs themselves, is still far from completely understood and a matter of active debate (13-18), it is at least phenomenologically believed that surface melting is driven by the reduction of the surface free energy by the presence of intervening liquid between the solid and gas phases (3,4,13,19). More sophisticated approaches have also been proposed in terms of surface phase transitions (1,3,4,20). In contrast to such theoretical speculations, however, the direct observation and the accurate characterization of QLLs by experiments are still highly challenging because of their thinness, assumed to be less t...