2016
DOI: 10.1049/el.2016.0890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two‐step reset method for energy‐efficient SAR ADC switching schemes

Abstract: The impact of the reset energy on the overall energy efficiency of an successive-approximation register (SAR) ADC is examined for some recently reported switching schemes. The reset energy can several times exceed the switching energy drawn from the reference during conversion. The simple method based on the optimal capacitor charging is proposed. By utilising of two-step switching during the reset phase, the total energy consumption of the DAC's capacitive matrix can be decreased by ∼20%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7]- [9] also save conversion energy, but they consume a reset energy that is 0.9×, 1.5×, and 2.2× the conversion energy, respectively. Techniques to save reset energy were introduced in [10] and [11], but these works require a third reference voltage (V CM ) and only include behavioral simulations without experimental validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7]- [9] also save conversion energy, but they consume a reset energy that is 0.9×, 1.5×, and 2.2× the conversion energy, respectively. Techniques to save reset energy were introduced in [10] and [11], but these works require a third reference voltage (V CM ) and only include behavioral simulations without experimental validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In capacitive DAC (CDAC)-based SAR ADCs, the switching energy consumed by CDAC is considerable during a SAR conversion cycle. Recently, various techniques have been developed to reduce the switching energy of CDAC arrays [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Compared with the conventional scheme, the V cm -based scheme [2], the switchback scheme [3] and Zhu [4] achieve a switching energy reduction of 87.5, 90.6 and 98.8%, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the switching energy and the reset energy into consideration to evaluate a switching scheme is more reasonable, as sometimes the reset energy is much higher than the switching energy [3][4][5]. To reduce the reset energy, a two-step reset method [6] and a swap-to-reset method [7] are developed. However, schemes in [6,7] only reduce the reset energy to some extent and complicate the control logic simultaneously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations