2015
DOI: 10.4054/demres.2015.32.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two period measures for comparing the fertility of marriage and cohabitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, within this population and over the last decades, unmarried cohabitation has become a mainstream context for family formation (Laplante and Fostik 2015a;2015b). Although recent research suggests that the difference in the hazard of breakdown between marriage and unmarried cohabitation decreased over the last decades in Quebec as the proportion of cohabiting couples increased (Pelletier 2015), this difference remains substantial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, within this population and over the last decades, unmarried cohabitation has become a mainstream context for family formation (Laplante and Fostik 2015a;2015b). Although recent research suggests that the difference in the hazard of breakdown between marriage and unmarried cohabitation decreased over the last decades in Quebec as the proportion of cohabiting couples increased (Pelletier 2015), this difference remains substantial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We use a three-pronged approach. First, we use the decomposition technique of period fertility measures introduced by Laplante and Fostik (2015). This technique allows the decomposition of fertility measures -age-specific fertility rates, cumulative fertility at any age, the total fertility rate -according to the states of a state space so that the contribution of each state to any of these measures are estimated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operation can also be interpreted as a decomposition exercise: the usual age-specific rates are decomposed in three sets of rates conditional on conjugal situation. The usual TFR can be interpreted as a weighted sum of the age-specific fertility rates of the three conjugal situations, the weights being the proportions of women living in each of the three conjugal situations (Laplante and Fostik 2015).…”
Section: Conditional Age-specific Fertility Rates and Tfrmentioning
confidence: 99%