2021
DOI: 10.1080/0269249x.2020.1853608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two new species of the diatom genusNaviculaBory (Bacillariophyceae) from Vietnam (Southeast Asia)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two species described herein are different from some other taxa previously described by us in that they are smaller and lack such prominent morphological features (see Kulikovskiy et al 2020a,b). Navicula babeiensis Chudaev, Glushchenko, Kulikovskiy & Kociolek and Navicula pseudokuseliana Chudaev, Glushchenko, Kulikovskiy & Kociolek are smaller and have no special morphological peculiarities like the two species described here (Kulikovskiy et al 2021). Two previously described species, Navicula gogorevii Chudaev, Glushchenko, Kulikovskiy & Kociolek and Navicula davidovichii Chudaev, Glushchenko, Kulikovskiy & Kociolek, are characterized by having large valves and large areolae in the striae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two species described herein are different from some other taxa previously described by us in that they are smaller and lack such prominent morphological features (see Kulikovskiy et al 2020a,b). Navicula babeiensis Chudaev, Glushchenko, Kulikovskiy & Kociolek and Navicula pseudokuseliana Chudaev, Glushchenko, Kulikovskiy & Kociolek are smaller and have no special morphological peculiarities like the two species described here (Kulikovskiy et al 2021). Two previously described species, Navicula gogorevii Chudaev, Glushchenko, Kulikovskiy & Kociolek and Navicula davidovichii Chudaev, Glushchenko, Kulikovskiy & Kociolek, are characterized by having large valves and large areolae in the striae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A comprehensive review of diatom studies was summarized in Glushchenko et al (2021) . A few publications were dedicated to the diversity of new species from the genus Navicula ( Chudaev et al 2018 ; Kulikovskiy et al 2020a , b , 2021 ) of Southeast Asia. Continuation of this work is important for understanding the diversity of the genus Navicula and diatoms as a whole from such an interesting region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…follows: E. umbratica MEG002 was compared with E. umbratica, E. infula, E. adriatica, E. punctulate, E. tenera, E. gracilis, E. pusilla, and E. vilicicii (Osada and Kobayasi, 1990;Mejdandzǐćet al, 2017;Mejdandzǐćet al, 2018). Navicula avium MEG004 was compared with N. avium, N. babeiensis, N. pseudokuseliana, N. coraliana, N. nielsfogedii, N. bergstromiana, N. kuseliana, N. serotina, and N. zanonii (Hustedt, 1949;Metzeltin and Lange-Bertalot, 1998;Rumrich et al, 2000;Kulikovskiy et al, 2012;Taylor et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017a;Sabbe et al, 2019;Chudaev et al, 2020;Kulikovskiy et al, 2021). P. inscriptura MEG005 was compared with P. inscriptura, P. obtusum, P. strigosum, P. rigidum, and P. williamsii (Sterrenburg, 2001;Reid, 2002;Stidolph, 2002;Sterrenburg, 2003;Harper et al, 2009).…”
Section: Comparisons Of Morphological Characteristics Of Diverse Diat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, a comprehensive understanding for molecular phylogenies of diatom species still remains unaddressed because available molecular data (e.g., molecular markers and organelle genomes) is insufficient to construct a high-resolute phylogenetic tree of diatom species despite their high species diversity (Visco et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2022a). Furthermore, several novel diatom species were reported with no molecular evidence because they were observed from field samples (Kryk et al, 2021;Kulikovskiy et al, 2021). Mann et al (2021) mentioned about controversial molecular data from morphologically unverified diatom species, which are available in the public databases (e.g., NCBI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%