Results of the absolute configuration determination of several compounds are analyzed by some enantiomer-estimators. As a consequence, some practical comments are given.As is well known, the only effective method of establishing the absolute configuration of a molecule is that proposed by Bijvoet (1949), based on anomalous scattering of X-rays. Applications of the Bijvoet method have been widely discussed by (inter alia) Bijvoet, Peerdeman and van Bommel (1951) and Ramachandran (1964). The method has also been satisfactorily applied to compounds in which oxygen is the heaviest atom. Engel (1972) and Karlsson (1976) recommend taking special care in the adjustment of the diffractometer, selection and mounting of the crystal and in the measuring procedure.We offer here some comments on the results of the absolute configuration determination of several molecules. The results, shown in Table 1, will be explained and discussed below.The following molecular models are going to be used in this paper: + χ: right enantiomeric model refined with anomalous dispersion correction, using both reflexions of the observed Bijvoet pairs hkl and hid.-x: wrong enantiomeric model refined with the same conditions as + x.-x,.: wrong enantiomeric model estimated from +x model, that is, identical coordinates as + χ apart from sign. + x«: right enantiomeric model estimated from -χ model, that is, identical coordinates as -χ apart from sign. X;: model refined without anomalous dispersion correction. + Xj: model refined from + χ without anomalous dispersion correction. -X;: model refined from -χ without anomalous dispersion correction.Brought to you by | University of California Authenticated Download Date | 6/2/15 6:32 AM