Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) 2014
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p14-2032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Knives Cut Better Than One: Chinese Word Segmentation with Dual Decomposition

Abstract: There are two dominant approaches to Chinese word segmentation: word-based and character-based models, each with respective strengths. Prior work has shown that gains in segmentation performance can be achieved from combining these two types of models; however, past efforts have not provided a practical technique to allow mainstream adoption. We propose a method that effectively combines the strength of both segmentation schemes using an efficient dual-decomposition algorithm for joint inference. Our method is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that our model can accommodate the integration of both types of features. This is similar in spirit to the work of Sun (2010) and Wang et al (2014), who integrated features of character-based and word-based segmentors.…”
Section: Error Analysissupporting
confidence: 60%
“…We show that our model can accommodate the integration of both types of features. This is similar in spirit to the work of Sun (2010) and Wang et al (2014), who integrated features of character-based and word-based segmentors.…”
Section: Error Analysissupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Further, lattice parsing-based approaches, where the input search space was represented as word-level lattices, were incorporated into CRFs (Smith, Smith, and Tromble 2005) for joint modeling of these tasks (Kudo, Yamamoto, and Matsumoto 2004). Neural sequence labeling approaches currently achieve state-of-the-art performance in word segmentation, especially for Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and so forth (Wang, Voigt, and Manning 2014;Shao, Hardmeier, and Nivre 2018). Similarly, higher-order CRFs (Müller, Schmid, and Schütze 2013) and neural morphological taggers (Malaviya, Gormley, and Neubig 2018;Tkachenko and Sirts 2018) are widely used for morphological parsing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of them have been followed by neural model versions (Liu et al, 2016) and (Zhang et al, 2016) respectively. There are also works integrating both character-based and word-based segmenters Sun, 2010;Wang et al, 2014) and semisupervised learning Kit, 2008b, 2011;Zeng et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%