2003
DOI: 10.1023/b:euph.0000003911.70493.cd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two independent gene loci controlling non-brittle pedicels in buckwheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple genetic base was reported in various crops, such as barley (Takahashi 1955), pearl millet (Ponecet et al 2000), common bean (Koinange et al 1996) and buckwheat (Matsui et al 2003), suggesting that the change to the non-shattering habit exerted a more pronounced effect on the domestication processes than the other genetic changes. Recent genome-wide QTL analysis between cultivated and wild rice, however, has revealed the complex nature of the seed-shattering habit, with QTLs detected on eight chromosomes of the rice genome (Xiong et al 1999, Cai and Morishima 2002, Thomson et al 2003, Lee et al 2005, Li et al 2006a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple genetic base was reported in various crops, such as barley (Takahashi 1955), pearl millet (Ponecet et al 2000), common bean (Koinange et al 1996) and buckwheat (Matsui et al 2003), suggesting that the change to the non-shattering habit exerted a more pronounced effect on the domestication processes than the other genetic changes. Recent genome-wide QTL analysis between cultivated and wild rice, however, has revealed the complex nature of the seed-shattering habit, with QTLs detected on eight chromosomes of the rice genome (Xiong et al 1999, Cai and Morishima 2002, Thomson et al 2003, Lee et al 2005, Li et al 2006a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further improvement in PHS tolerance in buckwheat would be necessary, because higher air temperatures, expected in global warming, raise the risk of preharvest sprouting . In addition to the cultivars with low preharvest sprouting mentioned above, a wild species F. homotropicum, known for its very strong seed dormancy (Wang and Campbell 2000) and compatibility to F. esculentum, should be a promising gene donor, although its extreme shattering habit (brittle pedicel) would need to be removed (Matsui et al 2003). In other crops like wheat, barley, maize, and rice, genetic analysis of preharvest sprouting and dormancy has discovered many QTLs and some causal genes (Nakamura 2018).…”
Section: Preharvest Sproutingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lines H and I were developed by selfing a single pin plant that segregated in F 3 . All the inbred lines were indirectly related to a homostyle plant (Y12-20) that was thought to be homozygous for a shattering-resistance gene (sht1sht1) (Matsui et al 2003a) and were the progeny obtained by either a single cross or recurrent crosses with a major or local variety in northern Japan (Table 1).…”
Section: Development Of Inbred Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, it has been revealed that the homostyly of F. homotropicum and heterostyly of common buckwheat are controlled by the multiple allelic gene S and the homostyle flower morph, and the self-compatibility of F. homotropicum is governed by the allele S h that is characterized by the dominance relation: S [ S h [ s (Woo et al 1999;Wang et al 2005). Besides, several important characteristics such as the inheritance of seed shattering (Matsui et al 2003a) and cross-compatibility between the flower morphs (Matsui et al 2003b(Matsui et al , 2004 have been studied. In the past decade, pure-line breeding of the selfpollinating buckwheat with homostyle flower morph has also been aggressively conducted, especially in Canada.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%