Two distinct neuroanatomical subtypes of schizophrenia revealed using machine learning

Abstract

Neurobiological heterogeneity in schizophrenia is poorly understood and confounds current analyses. We investigated neuroanatomical subtypes in a multi-institutional multi-ethnic cohort, using novel semi-supervised machine learning methods designed to discover patterns associated with disease rather than normal anatomical variation. Structural MRI and clinical measures in established schizophrenia (n = 307) and healthy controls (n = 364) were analysed across three sites of PHENOM (Psychosis Heterogeneity Evaluated via Dimensional Neuroimaging) consortium. Regional volumetric measures of grey matter, white matter, and CSF were used to identify distinct and reproducible neuroanatomical subtypes of schizophrenia. Two distinct neuroanatomical subtypes were found. Subtype 1 showed widespread lower grey matter volumes, most prominent in thalamus, nucleus accumbens, medial temporal, medial prefrontal/frontal and insular cortices. Subtype 2 showed increased volume in the basal ganglia and internal capsule, and otherwise normal brain volumes. Grey matter volume correlated negatively with illness duration in Subtype 1 (r = −0.201, P = 0.016) but not in Subtype 2 (r = −0.045, P = 0.652), potentially indicating different underlying neuropathological processes. The subtypes did not differ in age (t = −1.603, df = 305, P = 0.109), sex (chi-square = 0.013, df = 1, P = 0.910), illness duration (t = −0.167, df = 277, P = 0.868), antipsychotic dose (t = −0.439, df = 210, P = 0.521), age of illness onset (t = −1.355, df = 277, P = 0.177), positive symptoms (t = 0.249, df = 289, P = 0.803), negative symptoms (t = 0.151, df = 289, P = 0.879), or antipsychotic type (chi-square = 6.670, df = 3, P = 0.083). Subtype 1 had lower educational attainment than Subtype 2 (chi-square = 6.389, df = 2, P = 0.041). In conclusion, we discovered two distinct and highly reproducible neuroanatomical subtypes. Subtype 1 displayed widespread volume reduction correlating with illness duration, and worse premorbid functioning. Subtype 2 had normal and stable anatomy, except for larger basal ganglia and internal capsule, not explained by antipsychotic dose. These subtypes challenge the notion that brain volume loss is a general feature of schizophrenia and suggest differential aetiologies. They can facilitate strategies for clinical trial enrichment and stratification, and precision diagnostics.

Support Vector Machine-Based Schizophrenia Classification Using Morphological Information from Amygdaloid and Hippocampal Subregions

“…In a recent study, Lutz et al have found no large neurobiological differences between paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenia [ 48 ]. In line with the previous study, our results indicated that subtypes of schizophrenia characterized by clinical phenomenology might have difficulty in resolving neurobiological heterogeneity in schizophrenia due to overlapping symptomatology and longitudinal instability [ 48 ], while machine learning may stand a chance of investigating neurobiological heterogeneity in schizophrenia [ 49 ].…”

Personalized estimates of morphometric similarity in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia

“…There is emerging skepticism as to whether this is indeed the case. For example, a recent attempt to parse schizophrenia into subgroups defined by their neuroanatomy identified two subtypes of patients; these subtypes differed in the extent of the volumetric reductions along a continuum of severity and were associated with differences in IQ rather than any aspect of disease expression 44 . Additionally, studies that identified cognitive subtypes in either disorder have typically found that such subtypes were on a continuum of severity from non-impaired to having global deficits 30 .…”

Addressing Inaccurate Nosology in Mental Health: A Multi Label Data Cleansing Approach for Detecting Label Noise from Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data in Mood and Psychosis Disorders

“…Thus the use of additional subcategories or using dimensional information (as suggested in the NIMH RDoC approach)instead of a categorical approach may provide a more meaningful representation of relabeled subjects and underlying relation between them. More detailed mood disorder diagnoses will lead to more effective treatments [38] Cleansed data showed many more significant voxels than did the original data. In addition, the DSM-IV cleansed data showed more significant voxels than the Biotype cleansed data.…”