2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0093745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional Ta2NiSe5/GaSe van der Waals heterojunction for ultrasensitive visible and near-infrared dual-band photodetector

Abstract: Dual-band photodetectors have attracted intensive attention because of the requirement of multiband information [such as visible (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR)] in multicolor imaging technology, in which additional information beyond human vision could assist object identification and navigations. The use of 2D materials can break the limitation of high cost of conventional epitaxial semiconductors and a complex cryogenic cooling system for multi-band detection, but there is still much room to improve the perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure b, the dependence of responsivity and detectivity is detected under 532 nm laser illumination at V ds = 3 V. Both R and D * decrease as the laser power density increases, which is consistent with the observed sublinear relationship between I ph and P , possibly related to the saturation of trap states . An extremely high responsivity of 515.6 A W –1 is obtained at the incident power density of 17.5 mW cm –2 , which is higher than that of all Ta 2 NiSe 5 -based phototransistors. ,, Because of the low dark current of the heterojunction device (Figure S6a), the D * of the MoS 2 /Ta 2 NiSe 5 photodetector is up to the highest value of 3.1 × 10 13 Jones, which is comparable to that of the pure MoS 2 (∼3.9 × 10 12 Jones) and Ta 2 NiSe 5 devices (∼1.2 × 10 12 Jones). The D * of the heterostructure is superior to that reported in the MoS 2 /PdSe 2 photodetector (6.3 × 10 10 Jones), MoS 2 /MoTe 2 photodetector (1.4 × 10 8 Jones), and MoS 2 /GaSe photodetector (2.3 × 10 11 Jones) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure b, the dependence of responsivity and detectivity is detected under 532 nm laser illumination at V ds = 3 V. Both R and D * decrease as the laser power density increases, which is consistent with the observed sublinear relationship between I ph and P , possibly related to the saturation of trap states . An extremely high responsivity of 515.6 A W –1 is obtained at the incident power density of 17.5 mW cm –2 , which is higher than that of all Ta 2 NiSe 5 -based phototransistors. ,, Because of the low dark current of the heterojunction device (Figure S6a), the D * of the MoS 2 /Ta 2 NiSe 5 photodetector is up to the highest value of 3.1 × 10 13 Jones, which is comparable to that of the pure MoS 2 (∼3.9 × 10 12 Jones) and Ta 2 NiSe 5 devices (∼1.2 × 10 12 Jones). The D * of the heterostructure is superior to that reported in the MoS 2 /PdSe 2 photodetector (6.3 × 10 10 Jones), MoS 2 /MoTe 2 photodetector (1.4 × 10 8 Jones), and MoS 2 /GaSe photodetector (2.3 × 10 11 Jones) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…41 An extremely high responsivity of 515.6 A W −1 is obtained at the incident power density of 17.5 mW cm −2 , which is higher than that of all Ta 2 NiSe 5 -based phototransistors. [15][16][17]46,47 Because of the low dark current of the heterojunction device (Figure S6a), the D* of the MoS 2 / Ta 2 NiSe 5 photodetector is up to the highest value of 3.1 × 10 13 Jones, which is comparable to that of the pure MoS 2 (∼3.9 × 10 12 Jones) and Ta 2 NiSe 5 devices (∼1.2 × 10 12 Jones). The D* of the heterostructure is superior to that reported in the MoS 2 /PdSe 2 photodetector (6.3 × 10 10 Jones), 49 MoS 2 / MoTe 2 photodetector (1.4 × 10 8 Jones), 48 and MoS 2 /GaSe photodetector (2.3 × 10 11 Jones).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…4 Dual-band visible and infrared photodetectors (PDs) that can process signals of visible and infrared wavebands afford more accurate and comprehensive images of detected objects than obtained via single-band detection, which improves the detection and identification ability of the system. 1,2,5,6 The mature semiconductors such as silicon (visible, VIS, 400-700 nm), InGaAs (short-wave infrared, SWIR, 1.5-1.7 mm), and HgCdTe (mid-infrared, MIR, 3-12 mm) are the primary optoelectronic material systems that cover the broadband sensing range. 4,7,8 However, when integrating materials with different energy gaps into the same PD pixel, the lattice mismatch and incompatible preparation processes hinder the realization of visible/infrared dual-band PDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Dual-band visible and infrared photodetectors (PDs) that can process signals of visible and infrared wavebands afford more accurate and comprehensive images of detected objects than obtained via single-band detection, which improves the detection and identification ability of the system. 1,2,5,6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation