1962
DOI: 10.1038/1961296a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis of Pseudocholinesterase Components in Normal Human Serum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numbering from the anodal end, band 5 is the most intense, accounting for the major portion of the total activity. The bands cathodal to 5 are poorly resolved (22), particularly on acrylamide, are variable in number (23), and are known to be affected by storage (24). Our numbering system and results are identical to those of LaMotta, McComb, and Wetstone (25).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Numbering from the anodal end, band 5 is the most intense, accounting for the major portion of the total activity. The bands cathodal to 5 are poorly resolved (22), particularly on acrylamide, are variable in number (23), and are known to be affected by storage (24). Our numbering system and results are identical to those of LaMotta, McComb, and Wetstone (25).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Acrylamide gel (Canalco) was prepared with Tris-glycine buffer (pH 8.6). The material was stained for cholinesterase with a-naphthylacetate as substrate and fast blue B diazo coupler (21).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some individuals, enzymes with a higher activity than normal have been found which demonstrate electrophoretic variation from`usual' but the same inhibition characteristics. 12 One of these was designated the C5 variant and was thought to arise from a second BChE gene locus that was called E 2 , 13 although no molecular evidence for this second locus has been found to date (see below). The enzyme types attributed via biochemical analysis and inhibition numbers were phenotypes from which a genotype (as de¢ned by terms such as E 1 u E 1 u and E 1 a E 1 a ) was inferred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%