1966
DOI: 10.1172/jci105353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased plasma cholinesterase activity and succinylcholine resistance: a genetic variant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1
6

Year Published

1970
1970
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
20
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a 22-fold elevation in the suxamethonium hydrolysing capacity of the blood of cats reduced the effectiveness of suxamethonium only 16-fold. These findings are contrary to observations in man (Kalow & Gunn, 1957;Neitlich, 1966) and strongly indicate that in rats and cats hydrolysis of suxamethonium in blood plays very little or no part in determining the concentration of the ester reaching the motor end plate and its subsequent metabolic degradation. The reason for the difference between man and the laboratory animals used is at least two-fold.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Furthermore, a 22-fold elevation in the suxamethonium hydrolysing capacity of the blood of cats reduced the effectiveness of suxamethonium only 16-fold. These findings are contrary to observations in man (Kalow & Gunn, 1957;Neitlich, 1966) and strongly indicate that in rats and cats hydrolysis of suxamethonium in blood plays very little or no part in determining the concentration of the ester reaching the motor end plate and its subsequent metabolic degradation. The reason for the difference between man and the laboratory animals used is at least two-fold.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…(1983), Kalow and Genest (1957), Kalow and Gunn (1959), Kalow and Staron (1957), Krause eta!. (1988), Neitlich ( 1966), Rubinstein eta!. ( 1970), and Yoshida and Motu!…”
Section: The Cholinesterasesunclassified
“…E,s exists in several forms (Rubinstein et al, 1970) and results in 95 to 100% diminution of E u molecules; E,J results in about 66% reduction. One family has been described in which several members have greatly increased amounts of apparently normal serum cholinesterase (Neitlich, 1966;Yoshida and Motulsky, 1969). The gene responsible has been named E Cynthiana but it is not yet known if it is active at cholinesterase locus 1 or locus 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%