2016
DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2015.2482678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Dimensional Cartesian Memory Polynomial Model for Nonlinearity and I/Q Imperfection Compensation in Concurrent Dual-Band Transmitters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we have considered two 32-APSK constellation designs that are specified for the DVB-S2X standard [22]: one has three rings with 4, 12, and 16 points on each ring, and the other has four rings with 4, 8, 4, and 16 points on each ring. Our numerical investigation shows that the CD receiver is optimal (i.e., ρ * = 1) for the (4,12,16) design of 32-APSK, while the splitting receiver achieves a significant performance gain for the (4,8,4,16) design of 32-APSK and, interestingly, the gain is more profound at larger P or lower SER. Therefore, the performance analysis and characterization of the splitting receiver for practical modulation can only be done in a case-by-case basis.…”
Section: Ser Performancementioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, we have considered two 32-APSK constellation designs that are specified for the DVB-S2X standard [22]: one has three rings with 4, 12, and 16 points on each ring, and the other has four rings with 4, 8, 4, and 16 points on each ring. Our numerical investigation shows that the CD receiver is optimal (i.e., ρ * = 1) for the (4,12,16) design of 32-APSK, while the splitting receiver achieves a significant performance gain for the (4,8,4,16) design of 32-APSK and, interestingly, the gain is more profound at larger P or lower SER. Therefore, the performance analysis and characterization of the splitting receiver for practical modulation can only be done in a case-by-case basis.…”
Section: Ser Performancementioning
confidence: 88%
“…A coherent receiver is based on coherent detection (CD) [3], where the received RF-band signal is converted to a baseband signal with in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components by using a down-conversion circuit, which is then digitized through an analog-to-digital converter (ADC). The coherent receiver design is rather mature and has been adopted in most of the wireless communication standards, and the current research mostly focuses on two directions: I/Q imbalance compensation due to the hardware imperfection [4] and low-power design for both cellular and wireless sensor networks [5]. For the latter, low-resolution or even one-bit ADCs have been considered for massive MIMO systems [6], [7], since highresolution ADCs are power-hungry for portable devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 [11]. The inverse function is then extracted by exchanging the input signal x(n) by the gain normalised output signal y(n)/G, where G is the small signal gain of the PA [15].…”
Section: Digital Predistortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neural network models used for PA behavioral modeling mainly include bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) neural network [9], radial basis function (RBF) neural network [10] and time delay neural network (TDNN) [8]. However, there are few DPD models to jointly compensate I/Q imbalance and PA nonlinearities [11]- [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%