Two decades of satellite observations of AOD over mainland China using ATSR-2, AATSR and MODIS/Terra: data set evaluation and large-scale patterns

Abstract

Abstract. The retrieval of aerosol properties from satellite observations provides their spatial distribution over a wide area in cloud-free conditions. As such, they complement ground-based measurements by providing information over sparsely instrumented areas, albeit that significant differences may exist in both the type of information obtained and the temporal information from satellite and ground-based observations. In this paper, information from different types of satellite-based instruments is used to provide a 3-D climatology of aerosol properties over mainland China, i.e., vertical profiles of extinction coefficients from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP), a lidar flying aboard the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite and the columnintegrated extinction (aerosol optical depth -AOD) available from three radiometers: the European Space Agency (ESA)'s Along-Track Scanning Radiometer version 2 (ATSR-2), Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) (together referred to as ATSR) and NASA's Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aboard the Terra satellite, together spanning the period 1995-2015. AOD data are retrieved from ATSR using the ATSR dual view (ADV) v2.31 algorithm, while for MODIS Collection 6 (C6) the AOD data set is used that was obtained from merging the AODs obtained from the dark target (DT) and deep blue (DB) algorithms, further referred to as the DTDB merged AOD product. These data sets are validated and differences are compared using Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) version 2 L2.0 AOD data as reference. The results show that, over China, ATSR slightly underestimates the AOD and MODIS slightly overestimates the AOD. Consequently, ATSR AOD is overall lower than that from MODIS, and the difference increases with increasing AOD. The comparison also shows that neither of the ATSR and MODIS AOD data sets is better than the other one everywhere. However, ATSR ADV has limitations over bright surfaces which the MODIS DB was designed for. To allow for comparison of MODIS C6 results with previous analyses where MODIS Collection 5.1 (C5.1) data were used, also the difference between the C6 and C5.1 merged DTDB data sets from MODIS/Terra over China is briefly discussed.The AOD data sets show strong seasonal differences and the seasonal features vary with latitude and longitude across China. Two-decadal AOD time series, averaged over all of mainland China, are presented and briefly discussed. Using the 17 years of ATSR data as the basis and MODIS/Terra to follow the temporal evolution in recent years when the environmental satellite Envisat was lost requires a compariPublished by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.

Interannual variability and trends of combustion aerosol and dust in major continental outflows revealed by MODIS retrievals and CAM5 simulations during 2003–2017

“…For example, Song et al (2016) showed that the spring dust storm frequency in arid and semiarid regions of China has decreased by 15.45 storms per year on average over the period of 1982 to 2007. Fan et al (2014) showed that the decrease in springtime dust storms in Inner Mongolia, northern China, from 1982 to 2008 was correlated with advanced vegetation growth, with 1 d earlier green-up data corresponding to a 3 % decrease in spring dust storms. analyzed the frequency of sand and dust storms observed from ground stations in East Asia during 2007-2016 and found a decreasing trend that is associated with an increase in vegetation coverage and the weakening of the polar vortex.…”

Spatio-Temporal Variation in AOD and Correlation Analysis with PAR and NPP in China from 2001 to 2017

“…The decreasing trend of carbonaceous aerosols (e.g., organic carbon, elemental carbon) after 2008 and dust aerosol after 2010 may also contribute to the decline of AOD [40,41]. In addition, AOD variation may be influenced by thin cloud contamination in the satellite retrievals of AOD, meteorological factors, climate change and economic recession [42,43]. The greatest increase of AOD occurs in NP, accompanied with a largest decrease in PAR dir and PAR total and a second largest increase in PAR dif from 2001 to 2008.…”

Synergy of Satellite‐ and Ground‐Based Aerosol Optical Depth Measurements Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter Approach

“…There is general agreement on large scales, but regionally, differences can still be significant (Li et al, ; Prasad & Singh, ; Boiyo et al, ; Kahn et al, ; Tao et al, ; Li et al, ; Wang et al, ; Wei et al, ; Wei, Peng, et al, ). Discrepancies are also observed among different satellite data sets (Banks et al, ; Bibi et al, ; de Leeuw et al, ; de Leeuw et al, ). Moreover, even for the monthly mean product in which random errors have been largely averaged out, there are still disagreements.…”