2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2016.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two cryptic anatectic events within a syn-collisional granitoid from the Araçuaí orogen (southeastern Brazil): Evidence from the polymetamorphic Carlos Chagas batholith

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
1
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
46
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast with the hot thermal regime registered from the neighbour Carlos Chagas Batholith, located 50 km to the east, within the eastern domain ( Fig. 1b; Melo et al, 2016). In fact, this batholith records granulite-facies metamorphism (0.9-1.0 GPa and 790-820°C) at 570 Ma, age at which: 1) the Galiléia granitoids were already crystallized (632-570 Ma; Tedeschi et al, 2016) and 2) the Araçuaí Orogen was experiencing syn-collisional tectonics (Pedrosa-Soaeres et al, 2011).…”
Section: Geotectonic Implications: a New Tectonic Model For The Araçacontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in contrast with the hot thermal regime registered from the neighbour Carlos Chagas Batholith, located 50 km to the east, within the eastern domain ( Fig. 1b; Melo et al, 2016). In fact, this batholith records granulite-facies metamorphism (0.9-1.0 GPa and 790-820°C) at 570 Ma, age at which: 1) the Galiléia granitoids were already crystallized (632-570 Ma; Tedeschi et al, 2016) and 2) the Araçuaí Orogen was experiencing syn-collisional tectonics (Pedrosa-Soaeres et al, 2011).…”
Section: Geotectonic Implications: a New Tectonic Model For The Araçacontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Richter et al, 2015) and into the Carlos Chagas batholith characterized by peraluminous S-type granitoids (e.g. Melo et al, 2016). These rocks, according mainly to their location, ages and geochemistry (Pedrosa-Soares et al, 2001), are subdivided in syn-collisional (G2, 585-560 Ma), late collisional (G3; 560-530 Ma) and post-collisional (G4-G5, 530-480 Ma) supersuites.…”
Section: General Background Of the Araçuaí Orogenic Beltmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The precise 569 ± 6 Ma LA‐ICP‐MS concordant age obtained on sample 146 (M‐Domain II) restricts this group to the 565–575 Ma interval. This interval, as documented by various authors, represents the time of the largest production of syn‐collisional crustal melts in the Araçuaí orogen, represented by the leucogranites of the G2 Granite Supersuite (Gradim et al., ; Melo et al., ; Pedrosa‐Soares, De Campo et al., ; Peixoto et al., ; Richter et al., ; Silva, Pedrosa‐Soares, Armstrong, & Noce, ). Thus, ages of this group record the syn‐collisonal Barrovian metamorphic event in both domains.…”
Section: Discussion and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The following lithostratigraphic units are involved in this portion of the orogen (Figures 1–3): (1) a basement assemblage containing rocks older than 1.8 Ga, locally represented by gneisses and granitoids of the Porteirinha Complex (Noce, Pedrosa‐Soares, Silva, Armstrong, & Piuzana, ; Silva et al., ); (2) the rift‐sag sequences of the Espinhaço Supergroup deposited between 1.78 and 1.00 Ga (Chemale et al., ; Dussin & Dussin, ; Martins‐Neto, ); (3) the Macaúbas Group, a glacially influenced rift to passive margin succession accumulated between c . 850 and 600 Ma, and made up of metasandstones, metapelites and metadiamictites containing lenses and layers of banded iron formation, metacarbonates and metavolcanic rocks (Kuchenbecker, Pedrosa‐Soares, Babinski, & Fanning, ; Noce et al., ; Pedrosa‐Soares & Alkmim, ; Pedrosa‐Soares, Babinski et al., ); (4) syn‐collisonal granites emplaced between 630 and 580 Ma and grouped into the G2 and G3 supersuites (Gradim et al., ; Melo et al., ; Pedrosa‐Soares, De Campo et al., ); (5) the syn‐orogenic Salinas Formation, composed of turbiditic metasandstones, schists and metaconglomerates accumulated between 580 and 544 Ma (Lima, Martins‐Neto, Pedrosa‐Soares, Cordani, & Nutman, ; Peixoto, Pedrosa‐Soares, Alkmim, & Dussin, ; Santos, Alkmim, & Pedrosa‐Soares, ); and (6) late‐ to post‐collisional granites of the G4 and G5 supersuites, emplaced from 530 to 490 Ma (De Campos et al., , ; Pedrosa‐Soares & Wiedemann‐Leonardos, ; Pedrosa‐Soares, De Campo et al., ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%