2011
DOI: 10.1155/2011/198984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Cases of Appendiceal Intussusception: A Rare Diagnostic Pitfall in Colonoscopy

Abstract: Partially or completely invaginated appendix mistaken for a polyp during colonoscopy and leading to intussusception is a rare situation. This paper describes our experience with two cases of appendiceal intussusception. In the first case, there was no underlying ileocecal abnormality, and, in the second case, histologic examination of the resected appendix and cecum revealed widespread foci of angiodysplasia, and this was thought to be the basis for the intussusception. The authors present reviews of the liter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
12
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The most frequent histopathological finding which comes along with appendiceal intussusception is an inflammation, while the second most common diagnosis is endometrial implants in the intussuscepted appendix [4]. It is important to mention that intussusception of the appendix may occur without any underlying abnormality [9,10]. In our case, histopathological examination of surgical material has shown chronic active ulcerative inflammation, hyperplastic/regenerative mucous membrane lesions, and low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The most frequent histopathological finding which comes along with appendiceal intussusception is an inflammation, while the second most common diagnosis is endometrial implants in the intussuscepted appendix [4]. It is important to mention that intussusception of the appendix may occur without any underlying abnormality [9,10]. In our case, histopathological examination of surgical material has shown chronic active ulcerative inflammation, hyperplastic/regenerative mucous membrane lesions, and low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…3 Regarding our case, the involvement of the cecal appendix as a cause of intussusception was first described in 1858. 19,20 It's an uncommon condition with an incidence rate of 0.01% in an autopsy series. 21 Several etiologies have been noted: ana- tomic variations of the appendix, or pathologic conditions such as tumors [polyps, mucinous cystoadenoma or cystoadenocarcinoma, carcinoid tumor, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)], endometriosis, parasitism, cystic fibrosis, abnormal appendicular peristaltism, fecaliths, and foreign bodies.…”
Section: 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Several etiologies have been noted: ana- tomic variations of the appendix, or pathologic conditions such as tumors [polyps, mucinous cystoadenoma or cystoadenocarcinoma, carcinoid tumor, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)], endometriosis, parasitism, cystic fibrosis, abnormal appendicular peristaltism, fecaliths, and foreign bodies. 20,[22][23][24][25] Intussusception of the resultant appendiceal stump after inversion-ligation appendectomy has even been described. 22 Nevertheless, appendiceal intussusception may develop without any underlying abnormality.…”
Section: 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, systemic bacterial infection with fever and shivering has also been described in the literature, after simple endoscopic biopsies taken from an intussuscepted appendix. Symptoms retreated with broad spectrum antibiotherapy (Seddik & Rabhi, 2011). Special care should be taken in cases of simple appendectomy after reduction of the appendiceal intussusception, when the appendiceal stump is inverted with a purse-string suture into the caecal wall.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%