Diverticular disease of the colon is a common disease, mainly in the population over 50 years of age. In acute forms of presentation, we considered home treatment in those patients that were classified as having uncomplicated forms by means of clinical presentation and a computed tomography of the abdomen. According to these criteria, we treated 38 patients at home and admitted 18 patients to the hospital during the same period of time. No severe complications developed in the home-treatment patients. Home treatment is an effective alternative treatment for patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. In uncomplicated acute diverticulitis, home treatment benefits the patient, over hospitalization, by allowing better management of resources and by keeping the patient in a familiar environment where there is no risk of a nosocomial infection.
Introduction Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has rapidly emerged as a novel approach for rectal cancer surgery. Safety profiles are still emerging and more comparative data is urgently needed. This study aimed to compare indications and short‐term outcomes of TaTME, open, laparoscopic, and robotic TME internationally. Methods A pre‐planned analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) 2017 audit was performed. Patients undergoing elective total mesorectal excision (TME) for malignancy between 1 January 2017 and 15 March 2017 by any operative approach were included. The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leak. Results Of 2579 included patients, 76.2% (1966/2579) underwent TME with restorative anastomosis of which 19.9% (312/1966) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) which included a transanal component (TaTME). Overall, 9.0% (175/1951, 15 missing outcome data) of patients suffered an anastomotic leak. On univariate analysis both laparoscopic TaTME (OR 1.61, 1.02–2.48, P = 0.04) and robotic TaTME (OR 3.05, 1.10–7.34, P = 0.02) were associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leak than non‐transanal laparoscopic TME. However this association was lost in the mixed‐effects model controlling for patient and disease factors (OR 1.23, 0.77–1.97, P = 0.39 and OR 2.11, 0.79–5.62, P = 0.14 respectively), whilst low rectal anastomosis (OR 2.72, 1.55–4.77, P < 0.001) and male gender (OR 2.29, 1.52–3.44, P < 0.001) remained strongly associated. The overall positive circumferential margin resection rate was 4.0%, which varied between operative approaches: laparoscopic 3.2%, transanal 3.8%, open 4.7%, robotic 1%. Conclusion This contemporaneous international snapshot shows that uptake of the TaTME approach is widespread and is associated with surgically and pathologically acceptable results.
Intussusception is a rare cause of adult intestinal obstruction. Clinical manifestations are not specific, which makes a preoperative diagnosis difficult to establish and often causes delay. We report a case of acute intestinal obstruction due to ileocolic intussusception. An emergency laparoscopy was performed revealing an obstructive mass at the ileocecal region resulting from an appendicular tumor. A right hemicolectomy was conducted. The pathologic examination of the resected sample concluded the mass comprised an appendicular mucinous cystoadenoma. We discuss the clinical features, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical strategies of adult intussusception, as well as the uncommon finding of an appendicular mucinous tumor as its causative lesion, with a review of the available literature.Key words: Adult intussusception -Appendiceal mucocele -Intestinal obstruction I ntussusception is the invagination of a proximal segment of bowel (intussusceptum) into the lumen of the adjacent distal segment (intussuscipiens). Pediatric patients account for 95% of all cases of intussusception, in whom it is usually idiopathic or the result of a viral process; whereas adult patients account for only 1% to 5%, and an organic lesion is found in up to 90% of the adult cases. 1,2Acute bowel obstruction due to intussusception is rare in adults and accounts for 0.003% to 0.02% of hospital admissions and for only 1% of all intestinal obstructions.1 Preoperative diagnosis is a real challenge for physicians because of its unspecific and extremely variable presentation and requires a high index of suspicion. Therefore, the initial diagnosis is usually missed or delayed and may only be established during surgery. [3][4][5] We present a very uncommon case of acute intestinal obstruction resulting from an ileocolic intussusception secondary to a mucinous tumor of the appendix and review the literature about this finding as a lead point. Case ReportA 57-year-old female presented to the emergency department with a 2-to 3-month history of intermittent and worsening abdominal pain, great- est in the right lower quadrant, which had increased gradually over the past 3 days. It was associated with dizziness and diarrhea but she denied any history of fever, nausea, vomiting, bloody stools, or weight loss. The patient's medical history included a groin hernia surgery and gastroesophageal reflux on oral treatment.Initial vital signs were within normal limits. Abdominal examination revealed diffuse tenderness on palpation, above all in the right lower quadrant, but without rebound or voluntary guarding. There was no palpable mass, and the auscultation found struggle bowel sounds. Blood tests were normal as was urine analysis.Abdominal X-ray exam was not demonstrative of intestinal obstruction. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis showed a pathologic mass at the ileocolic region, of cystic appearance with parietal calcifications, with edematous pericolonic fat stranding suggesting of ileocolic intussusception causing an intestinal obstr...
Background Laparoscopy has now been implemented as a standard of care for elective colonic resection around the world. During the adoption period, studies showed that conversion may be detrimental to patients, with poorer outcomes than both laparoscopic completed or planned open surgery. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether laparoscopic conversion was associated with a higher major complication rate than planned open surgery in contemporary, international practice. Methods Combined analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology 2017 and 2015 audits. Patients were included if they underwent elective resection of a colonic segment from the caecum to the rectosigmoid junction with primary anastomosis. The primary outcome measure was the 30‐day major complication rate, defined as Clavien‐Dindo grade III‐V. Results Of 3980 patients, 64% (2561/3980) underwent laparoscopic surgery and a laparoscopic conversion rate of 14% (359/2561). The major complication rate was highest after open surgery (laparoscopic 7.4%, converted 9.7%, open 11.6%, P < 0.001). After case mix adjustment in a multilevel model, only planned open (and not laparoscopic converted) surgery was associated with increased major complications in comparison to laparoscopic surgery (OR 1.64, 1.27–2.11, P < 0.001). Conclusions Appropriate laparoscopic conversion should not be considered a treatment failure in modern practice. Conversion does not appear to place patients at increased risk of complications vs planned open surgery, supporting broadening of selection criteria for attempted laparoscopy in elective colonic resection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.