Twisting and Bending of Biological Beams: Distribution of Biological Beams in a Stiffness Mechanospace

Abstract

Most biological beams bend and twist relatively easily compared to human-made structures. This paper investigates flexibility in 57 diverse biological beams in an effort to identify common patterns in the relationship between flexural stiffness and torsional stiffness. The patterns are investigated by mapping both ideal and biological beams into a mechanospace defined by flexural and torsional stiffness. The distribution of biological beams is not random, but is generally limited to particular regions of the mechanospace. Biological beams that are stiff in bending are stiff in torsion, while those that bend easily also twist easily. Unoccupied regions of the mechanospace represent rare combinations of mechanical properties, without proving that they are impossible. The mechanical properties of biological beams closely resemble theoretical expectations for ideal beams. Both distributions are potentially being driven by the interdependence of the material and structural properties determining stiffness. The mechanospace can be used as a broadly comparative tool to highlight systems that fall outside the general pattern observed in this study. These outlying beams may be of particular interest to both biologists and engineers due to either material or structural innovations.

Feeding in billfishes: inferring the role of the rostrum from a biomechanical standpoint

“…the force per unit area, or stress, σ, that builds in a material under load in response to deformation, or strain, ε) can therefore provide an understanding of the overall structure's mechanical capabilities and limits, with stress distributions and yield behavior pointing to performance boundaries, all of which can offer clues to loading regimes likely to be experienced in vivo. Because EI accounts for both material and structural properties, it is a useful metric for characterizing mechanical function in comparative studies, particularly when linking organismal function with evolutionary and ecological pressures (Koehl, 1976(Koehl, , 1977Macleod, 1980;Etnier, 2003). Flexural stiffness has been shown to correlate with loading regime and direction for a range of biological body support systems, from the limb skeletons of batoids and dogs, to the jaws of whales and pelicans, to the exoskeletons of crabs (Kemp et al, 2005;Taylor et al, 2007;Field et al, 2011;Macesic and Summers, 2012); these taxonomic comparisons also illustrate that higher levels of bending resistance can be attained evolutionarily by increases in either E or I, or in both.…”

Modelling of the buckling of a diaphragm–spine structure for a wave energy converter

“…The natural world is full of anisotropy in its structural elements [4] and hydrostats, which take their shape and stiffness from internal fluid pressure, are being investigated as a way to induce controllable anisotropy in composite materials [5]. FEA can also be used to investigate large deformations in anisotropic elastic materials [6].…”

Modelling the micro- and macro-structure efficiencies of a compliant petiole beam

“…Compliance of biological beams has been a subject of interest for many biologists in the last two decades [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The compliance to torsion, as opposed to bending, was the focus of experimental and theoretical investigations, based on continuum mechanics.…”