1969
DOI: 10.1007/bf00550122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twinning in lead

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dislocation reaction has a high-energy barrier and might be difficult to activate. Nanocrystalline materials have a much higher strength than their coarse-grained counterparts [38][39][40], and therefore deform under very high stress. This high stress helps overcome the high-energy barrier for the dislocation reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dislocation reaction has a high-energy barrier and might be difficult to activate. Nanocrystalline materials have a much higher strength than their coarse-grained counterparts [38][39][40], and therefore deform under very high stress. This high stress helps overcome the high-energy barrier for the dislocation reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34] The reverse Hall-Petch effect seems to depend strongly on the sample preparation technique used and on the sample history, perhaps indicating that in most cases the reverse Hall-Petch effect is caused by various kinds of defects in the samples. Surface defects alone have been shown to be able to decrease the strength of nanocrystalline metals by a factor of 5, 58,66 and recent studies have shown that even very small amounts of porosity can have a dramatic effect on the strength. 60,67 Improved inert gas condensation techniques 68 have reduced the porosity resulting in samples with densities above 98% of the fully dense value.…”
Section: B Reverse Hall-petch Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand some data are possibly consistent with Eq. (1) although with a lower value of K than for larger grain sizes [30][31][32][33][34] and on the other hand some data exhibit an apparent Fig. 1 The maximum yield strength, r p,max /l, obtained by ECAP versus the absolute melting temperature, T m , for fcc metals Al 120 [14] 122 [22] 119 [22] Au 245 [25] 237 [unpublished] Cu 395 [14] 380 [26] 390 [27] 383 [22] Ni -1138 [unpublished] decrease in yield stress with decreasing grain size indicating a softening effect at very fine grain sizes [32,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%