2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twenty-four Hour and Spot Urine Metabolic Evaluations: Correlations Versus Agreements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty-four hour urine collection is a considered superior method of screening for hypercalciuria than a fasting spot UCa/Cr in people [44–46], and 24-hour samples are commonly used to quantify other urinary metals as well [27, 3031, 34]. The authors are not aware of any direct comparisons of spot versus 24-hour urinary element measurements in dogs, and both methods have been used to demonstrate the presence of hypercalciuria in dogs with CaOx urolithiasis [10, 47–49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-four hour urine collection is a considered superior method of screening for hypercalciuria than a fasting spot UCa/Cr in people [44–46], and 24-hour samples are commonly used to quantify other urinary metals as well [27, 3031, 34]. The authors are not aware of any direct comparisons of spot versus 24-hour urinary element measurements in dogs, and both methods have been used to demonstrate the presence of hypercalciuria in dogs with CaOx urolithiasis [10, 47–49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, a significant correlation was detected between the spot urine calcium/creatinine ratio and the 24-hour calcium excretion, although the correlation coefficient was low (r=0.521). Hong et al (16) could not find a correlation between the 24-hour urinary Na excretion and early morning (AM) spot urine Na excretion. They found a significant but low correlation with K (r=0.39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Bland-Altman approach is considered a better method to assess the agreement between two methods of measurement than correlation, particularly as related to individual patient management [11,16,24]. With this approach, the measurement differences between the two methods are plotted against the mean of the two measurements to visualize how much the measurement by the new method (i.e., estimation using spot urine) differs from the one by the reference method (i.e., measurement of the actual 24-hour urinary excretion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%