2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40257-019-00480-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twenty Clinically Pertinent Factors/Observations for Percutaneous Absorption in Humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many factors affecting percutaneous absorption of substances, including base formulation, physicochemical properties, skin application sites, population variability, and skin surface conditions, are taken into consideration, thus, the extrapolated concentration of amla branch extract would be in the range of 0.05–0.1%. 28 , 50 The previous study reported the extrapolated in vitro noncytotoxic concentration (0.1 mg/mL) to the relevant concentration (0.1 and 0.2%) added into cosmetic product is the safe concentration without induction of skin irritation in the clinical study. 29 So, 0.1% was selected to add in the gel preparation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many factors affecting percutaneous absorption of substances, including base formulation, physicochemical properties, skin application sites, population variability, and skin surface conditions, are taken into consideration, thus, the extrapolated concentration of amla branch extract would be in the range of 0.05–0.1%. 28 , 50 The previous study reported the extrapolated in vitro noncytotoxic concentration (0.1 mg/mL) to the relevant concentration (0.1 and 0.2%) added into cosmetic product is the safe concentration without induction of skin irritation in the clinical study. 29 So, 0.1% was selected to add in the gel preparation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the lipid matrix within the epidermis, compromised skin barriers in disease states, ageing, concentration of applied dose, formulation differences, surface area, occlusion affecting hydration and temperature, number of doses, skin binding, and skin contact time. (Law et al, 2020; Maibach et al, 1971; Maibach & Feldmann, 1975; Wester & Maibach, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decontamination may actually increase skin absorption, by washing chemical contaminants into the skin, a phenomenon known as the “wash‐in” effect (Law et al, 2020; Moody & Maibach, 2006). The “wash‐in” effect, demonstrated in animal models and in vitro human studies, may enhance both cutaneous and systemic toxicity by several likely mechanisms including the surfactant effect, hydration effect, acid/base effect, friction effect, and/or artefact effect (Moody & Maibach, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some additional factors such as the skin of different populations (pediatric, adult, elderly, different ethnicity, diseased) or different anatomical regions (face, neck, scalp, forehead, upper arm, lower leg, upper leg, inner forearm, outer forearm, back, abdomen, etc.) [64,65] should also be considered when ex vivo models are evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%