2011
DOI: 10.3145/epi.2011.ene.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tutoriales Web: Indicadores y Ejemplos de Buenas Prácticas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The librarian and academic communities have great interest in online information literacy and library instruction, shown by the huge amounts of literature on the subject (Fernández-Ramos, 2016b). The majority of these studies deal with concrete initiatives in creating tutorials in some library, describing in detail the stages followed in its elaboration and the contents or software used (Noe and Bishop, 2005;Somoza-Fernández and Rodríguez-Parada, 2011); however, we may also find in the literature few articles about creation guidelines for this type of materials (Koneru, 2010;Nagra and Coiffe, 2010;Rand, 2013), review of good practices (Dewan and Steeleworthy, 2013;Hess, 2013;Maddison, 2013), comparison of different types of tutorials (Baker, 2014;Craig and Friehs, 2013;Hahn, 2012;Turner et al, 2015) or studies regarding the effectiveness of this type of instruction compared to face-to-face instruction (Hess, 2014;Mery et al, 2012;Silk et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The librarian and academic communities have great interest in online information literacy and library instruction, shown by the huge amounts of literature on the subject (Fernández-Ramos, 2016b). The majority of these studies deal with concrete initiatives in creating tutorials in some library, describing in detail the stages followed in its elaboration and the contents or software used (Noe and Bishop, 2005;Somoza-Fernández and Rodríguez-Parada, 2011); however, we may also find in the literature few articles about creation guidelines for this type of materials (Koneru, 2010;Nagra and Coiffe, 2010;Rand, 2013), review of good practices (Dewan and Steeleworthy, 2013;Hess, 2013;Maddison, 2013), comparison of different types of tutorials (Baker, 2014;Craig and Friehs, 2013;Hahn, 2012;Turner et al, 2015) or studies regarding the effectiveness of this type of instruction compared to face-to-face instruction (Hess, 2014;Mery et al, 2012;Silk et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%