2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-003-0035-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tusk abnormalities in wild boar ( Sus scrofa L.)

Abstract: This paper describes pathological alterations in the permanent canines (tusks) of four male wild boars. The mandibular tusks of all individuals, and also some of the maxillary tusks, exhibited an extended enamel hypoplasia in their apical portion, denoting an impairment of secretory ameloblast function. Moreover, the pulp cavities of the mandibular tusks were exposed through cleft-like openings in the wear (whetting) surfaces of the teeth. Presence of a plug of reparative dentine within the pulp cavity was obs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They usually result from the splitting of a bud or from local hyperactivity of the dental lamina (Garvey et al, 1999), although the topic is not resolved yet (Henderson & Greene, 1975). Studies of such anomalies in wild and domestic pigs have been carried out for quite a while (Gupta, 1978;Miles & Grigson, 1990;Feldhammer & McCann, 2004;Kierdorf et al, 2004b;Konjevic et al, 2006, and so on). However, most of the studies are focused on tusk abnormalities of modern animals (Kierdorf et al, 2000;Kierdorf and Kierdorf, 2003;,b,c, 2005Konjevic et al, 2004aKonjevic et al, ,b, 2006 with little or no information on archeological material (Magnell & Carter, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They usually result from the splitting of a bud or from local hyperactivity of the dental lamina (Garvey et al, 1999), although the topic is not resolved yet (Henderson & Greene, 1975). Studies of such anomalies in wild and domestic pigs have been carried out for quite a while (Gupta, 1978;Miles & Grigson, 1990;Feldhammer & McCann, 2004;Kierdorf et al, 2004b;Konjevic et al, 2006, and so on). However, most of the studies are focused on tusk abnormalities of modern animals (Kierdorf et al, 2000;Kierdorf and Kierdorf, 2003;,b,c, 2005Konjevic et al, 2004aKonjevic et al, ,b, 2006 with little or no information on archeological material (Magnell & Carter, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although there are several papers dealing with enamel defects on recent boars tusks (e.g. Palášthy, Palášthy 1991; Kierdorf, Kierdorf 2003;Kierdorf et al 2004;Konjević et al 2006), no author has discussed the time of onset of these defects. The same is true for prehistoric and historic finds of canines of domestic pigs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palášthy, Palášthy 1991; Kierdorf, Rühe 2002;Kierdorf, Kierdorf 2003;Kierdorf et al 2004;Konjević et al 2004;2006). This is due to the fact that (mainly the lower) tusks are valuable trophies for hunters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animals of interest, namely male adolescent boars older than 10 month and perennial male adult boars, were selected by their tooth eruption and tooth wear, where the tooth eruption allows for narrow age estimation in the period between the 5th and 24th month of life (Kierdorf et al, 2004;Stubbe, 2009). Whenever a shot boar was older than 24 month, the age was estimated due to the extent of tooth wear.…”
Section: Animals and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%