Turnaround in Rough Sea—Electricity Market in Germany

Pfaffenberger, Wolfgang; Chrischilles, Esther

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397891-2.00004-3

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As described in Pfaffenberger and Chrischilles (2013, pp. 116-17), the renewable energy surcharge has already risen considerably in Germany since the establishment, as found in 5.3 c/kWh in euro (approximately 6.9 c/kWh in US dollar) in 2013.…”

Section: Issues and Discussion About Japanese Market Reformmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, it was important for France to simultaneously consider an institutional change, completion and a regulated tariff system. Fourth, Pfaffenberger and Chrischilles (2013) discussed that it was necessary for the market reform to consider a long period for its implementation in Europe. For example, the market reform, including a use of renewable energies, was required to make a linkage to a transmission grid system.…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Electric power market reform in Japan after Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster

Goto

Sueyoshi

2015

IJESM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study is to review the current status and related issues on the market reform of Japanese electric power industry after Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster. We also discuss the future policy direction for the market reform. Design/methodology/approach This research compares the reform process of Japanese electric power industry with that of European Union (EU) nations. Then, this study discusses policy issues on the Japanese market reform based upon our comparative analysis. Findings Japan may learn many things from the market liberalization process and institution of EU nations. In the learning process, it is necessary to pay attention to industrial differences between Japan and the EU nations. Each country has its own unique features on fuel mix, business environment as well as supply and demand relationship. Such differences may influence a desirable policy direction for each nation’s market reform. The international comparison discussed in this study indicates the importance of a step-by-step approach in which Japan can gradually incorporate European experiences into the Japanese market reform. Research limitations/implications Since this study focuses upon the Japanese market reform, the empirical findings may have limited policy implications. The implications obtained from Japanese experience need additional thought in shifting them to other nations. Such an extension will be an important future task of this study. Originality/value This study discusses the current policy issues and future direction on the Japanese electricity market reform. This study also suggests its future direction. Previous research has never discussed the Japanese experience. Policy makers, corporate leaders, and individuals in the world, who are involved in the energy industry, have been paying attention to the Japanese future energy direction after Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster. This study provides such a future energy direction on Japanese market reform from European experience.

show abstract

Section: Issues and Discussion About Japanese Market Reformmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electric power market reform in Japan after Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster

Goto

Sueyoshi

2015

IJESM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Germany plays a significant role in this context due to the large size of its economy and the political decision to phase out its nuclear fleet by 2022, mostly to be replaced by renewable generation, as further described in Chapters 4 (Pfaffenberger and Chrischilles, 2013) and 7 (Bauknecht et al, 2013). The…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Growing Impact of Renewable Energy in European Electricity Markets

Haas

Auer

Resch

et al. 2013

Evolution of Global Electricity Markets

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Framework to Evaluate Security of Supply in the Electricity Sector

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Security of Electricity Supply (SoES) has become a major concern for regulators and policymakers over the last decade. However, most work focusses either more generally on energy security or on a single fuel. We develop a comprehensive but flexible framework to assess the SoES for a single jurisdiction, taking into the account the specificities of electricity. This framework has two aims: (i) provide a snapshot of the situation to understand current weaknesses and determine what actions are required; (ii) capture the evolution over time to evaluate progress and identify potential problems before they materialise. The framework, based on an extensive literature review, consists of twelve dimensions that are critical for SoES. We develop metrics that capture the state and evolution of each dimension. This framework is intended to be a management information tool for all stakeholders, aimed at organising data and structuring its analysis, to enable monitoring the evolution of the SoES, while also functioning as an early-warning system by flagging potential future problems.

show abstract

Turnaround in Rough Sea—Electricity Market in Germany

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

Electric power market reform in Japan after Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster

Electric power market reform in Japan after Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster

The Growing Impact of Renewable Energy in European Electricity Markets

A Framework to Evaluate Security of Supply in the Electricity Sector

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About