Türkiye'de Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi Üzerine 2009-2013 Yılları Arasında Yapılan Çalışmalardaki Eğilimler

Dikmen, Cemal Hakan; Demirer, Veysel

doi:10.19128/turje.77632

Cited by 16 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Usta & Altun, 2017). The research(Dikmen & Demirer, 2016) supports this trend. 18% of the articles is based on technology integration into education, which is the second highest value.…”

supporting

confidence: 72%

“…Additionally, it is stated that the highest number of research done in Turkey between 2005 and 2013 are carried out with pre-service teachers (Baran & Canbazoglu Bilici, 2015). The national thesis and articles published between 2009 and 2013 revealed that 37% of the articles were about teacher candidates, 10% was about in-service teachers and 1% was about academicians (Dikmen & Demirer, 2016). The thematic analysis of the master thesis about TPACK between 2009 and 2019 showed 53.3% of the theses were about teacher candidates and 46.7% were about teachers (Çınar, 2022).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The research done in Turkey are mostly focused on teachers of science and technology and teacher candidates of mathematics and primary school (Baran & Canbazoglu Bilici, 2015). The descending list of content areas in the research published between 2009 and 2013 is as follows: mathematic teachers, science and technology teachers, primary school teachers and English teachers (Dikmen & Demirer, 2016). The research conveyed with pre-service teachers shows the articles are in the fields of science and technology, mathematic, primary school and English respectively (Çınar, 2022).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Systematic Review of Research Conducted on the Techno-Pedagogical Content Knowledge of English Teachers

ÇAVUŞOĞLU,

KINCAL,

KARTAL

2023

Journal of Family Counseling and Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study is a systematic review of research on the databases of Web of Science, and Springer between the years 2012 and 2022 on the subject of the development of English teacher techno-pedagogical content knowledge. For the study group, the key concepts “the English teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge”, “English teacher & technology”, “EFL & technology”, “ESL & technology”, “TPACK (technological pedagogical content knowledge)”, “English teaching & technology” were used to search on databases. The study group was formed with a total of 36 articles. In data analysis, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) was used from topic modeling methods. As a result of LDA, four topics were created: “teachers’ self-efficacy in technology integration”, “instructional challenges in higher education institutions”, “pre-service teachers' approaches to the implementations of information and communication technologies” and “teachers' professional development in Teaching English as a Foreign Language”. Accordingly, the need for TPACK for English teachers and teaching English, technology-based transformation and opportunities in English curriculums caused by TPACK, differences in teaching principles and methods of English brought out by TPACK, diversification of technology of teaching and materials, including TPACK in pre-service and in-service professional development curriculum, other qualifications of teachers such as thinking skills are some distinctive trends.

show abstract

“…Usta & Altun, 2017). The research(Dikmen & Demirer, 2016) supports this trend. 18% of the articles is based on technology integration into education, which is the second highest value.…”

supporting

confidence: 72%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Systematic Review of Research Conducted on the Techno-Pedagogical Content Knowledge of English Teachers

ÇAVUŞOĞLU,

KINCAL,

KARTAL

2023

Journal of Family Counseling and Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Technology knowledge increased distance education evaluation general level, technical level and learning process level. There are many studies in the literature on technological pedagogical content knowledge (Car & Aydos, 2020;Dikmen & Demirer, 2016;Gomleksiz, 2013;Gudek & Aciksoz, 2018;Kocak Usluel et al, 2015;Unal, 2013). In the articles examined in the TPACK studies reviewed by Korucu et al, (2017)., the education provided without TPACK and the education provided with TPACK support were compared, and the results were generally found that incorporating TPACK into teacher education would contribute to the academic success of teacher candidates; It has been concluded that technological pedagogical content knowledge and technology-related anxiety and stress have a negative relationship, that is, as TPACK increases, technological self-confidence will also increase.…”

Section: Conclusion Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has become a more important concept than the sum of the competencies that have (Dikmen & Demirer, 2016). When the components that make up the technological pedagogical content knowledge are examined, it is seen that there are seven different knowledge areas.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technological pedagogical content knowledge as a predictor of physical education and sports teachers' evaluations of distance education

Akkaya

2021

CJES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to reveal whether physical education and sports teachers' technological pedagogical knowledge levels and some variables are significant predictors of distance education evaluation levels. The correlational design, in which the direction and strength of the relationship between more than one variable were investigated, was used in the study. The research group consists of 213 physical education and sports teachers. The data of the research were collected with the Technologic Pedagogical Content Knowledge Scale and Distance Education Evaluation Scale Technologic pedagogical content knowledge general level has increased distance education evaluation general level. Technology knowledge increased distance education evaluation general level, technical level and learning process level. Based on the results, it can be recommended that physical education and sports teachers should be given trainings to increase their technological pedagogical content knowledge levels with the aim of minimizing the problems experienced by physical education and sports teachers in the distance education process and increasing the quality of education. Keywords:Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Distance Education; Physical Education And Sports Teachers

show abstract

Research Models Used in Doctoral Theses on Sport Management in Turkey: A Content Analysis

Atalay¹

2018

ujer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to examine the methodological tendencies in the doctorate theses which were prepared in the field of Sports Management in Turkish between 2007 and 2016 and which were open to access in the database of the Council of Higher Education (CHE) National Theses Center. In this context, 111 doctorate theses prepared in the last decade were examined. The study was conducted with the Qualitative Research Method, which is frequently used in social sciences, and the Case Study Method was also made use of in the course of the study. The data obtained in the study were analyzed and interpreted with the Content Analysis Method. According to findings, it was determined that the study method was not mentioned in 92 of the 111 doctorate theses, which were included in the study; the study design was not mentioned in 36 of them; and the sampling method was not mentioned in 46 of them. It was also determined that the Questionnaire Method was used frequently in the doctorate theses that were examined in the context of the study; and the Data analysis methods that were used frequently were the Descriptive and Predictive Analysis Methods. As a result, it is possible to claim that the methodological structures of the doctorate theses are extremely missing and inadequate. In addition, it is clear that the methodological structures of the theses are weak and unclear, and cannot convey the methodological data to the reader in an accurate manner. Right at this point, it may be recommended to consider the doctorate thesis literature on Sports Management again, and certain and meticulous rules are set for future studies in terms of writing styles and methodological structures.

show abstract

Türkiye'de Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi Üzerine 2009-2013 Yılları Arasında Yapılan Çalışmalardaki Eğilimler

Cited by 16 publications

References 11 publications

Systematic Review of Research Conducted on the Techno-Pedagogical Content Knowledge of English Teachers

Systematic Review of Research Conducted on the Techno-Pedagogical Content Knowledge of English Teachers

Technological pedagogical content knowledge as a predictor of physical education and sports teachers' evaluations of distance education

Research Models Used in Doctoral Theses on Sport Management in Turkey: A Content Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About