2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turkish version of the Intuitive Eating Scale-2: Validity and reliability among university students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The EDE-Q has shown satisfactory concurrent and criterion validity in previous research and excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability [32]. Prior non-clinical research has shown strong inverse relationships between scores on the IES-2 and scores on the EDE-Q for both the total global score and all individual subscales [3]. In the current sample, internal consistency was high for both the global score (0.92) and the individual subscales; restraint (0.83), weight concern (0.84), shape concern (0.90), and eating concern (0.75).…”
Section: Eating Disorder Symptomatologymentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EDE-Q has shown satisfactory concurrent and criterion validity in previous research and excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability [32]. Prior non-clinical research has shown strong inverse relationships between scores on the IES-2 and scores on the EDE-Q for both the total global score and all individual subscales [3]. In the current sample, internal consistency was high for both the global score (0.92) and the individual subscales; restraint (0.83), weight concern (0.84), shape concern (0.90), and eating concern (0.75).…”
Section: Eating Disorder Symptomatologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Despite being widely used, several aspects of this common measure remain unclear. First, though the IES-2 has a well-documented four-component structure in research using non-clinical samples [3,10,40], evidence as to whether the hypothesised four-component structure will replicate in clinical populations is not yet known. Understanding and validating the structure in a clinical context is important to clarify whether or not the IES-2 is suited to this population and whether scores can be interpreted as intended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This IES utilizes a three-factor model (unconditional permission to eat, eating for physical rather than emotional reasons, reliance on internal hunger/satiety cues) as opposed to Hawk's four-factor IES [10] . Most scholars currently agree that the IES developed by Tylka better re ects individual IE [12,18,19,20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has demonstrated that the IES-2 is a reliable and valid instrument in assessing intuitive eating across different ethnic populations (Bas et al, 2017;Camilleri et al, 2015;Carbonneau et al, 2016;Tylka & Kroon Van Diest, 2013). However, a literature gap exists in the following aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%