2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74913-4_120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turing Complete Catalytic Particle Computers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 6D shows a different style of algorithmic behavior: a state machine (5,6). This state machine increments the number of green spikes between consecutive red spikes by 1 every time.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 6D shows a different style of algorithmic behavior: a state machine (5,6). This state machine increments the number of green spikes between consecutive red spikes by 1 every time.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we ask: Given a set of formal chemical reaction equations, involving formal species X 1 ; X 2 ; …; X n , can we find a set of actual molecules M 1 ; M 2 ; …; M m that interact in an appropriate buffer to approximate the formal system's mass-action kinetics? If this were possible, the formalism of chemical reaction networks (CRNs) could be treated as an effective programming language for the design of complex network behavior (5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, work by Liekens and Fernando (Liekens and Fernando 2007) shows how to approximate in a language of discrete chemistry finite computations of Register Machines with an error probability smaller than any given precision δ > 0. Soloveichik et al (Soloveichik et al 2008), besides proving that in notations for discrete chemistry it is not possible to precisely model any Turing powerful formalism, show also how to approximate unbounded computations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%