Turbulence Management by Groove Roughness

Tani, Itirô; Munakata, Hirosuke; Matsumoto, Akira; Abe, Kazuki

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-83281-9_12

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Elavarasan et al (1996) found an increase in friction drag of about 3 -4% for a surface with grooves spaced s/w = 20 apart. Tani et al (1987) found that the skin-friction on a smooth surface with grooves spaced 10-40w apart was lower than that on a corresponding smooth-wall over a certain range of Reynolds number. Sutardi and Ching (1999) reported that there is an increase in C f over the smooth-wall value immediately downstream of the groove, followed by a decrease and a subsequent oscillatory relaxation back to the smooth-wall value.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Computational analysis of frictional drag over transverse grooved flat plates

Ranjan¹,

Ranjan²,

Singh³

2011

Int. J. Eng. Sci. Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Skin-friction coefficient of turbulent boundary layer flow over a smooth-wall with transverse square grooves is investigated for four grooved-wall cases. The four grooved-wall configurations is like'd' type rough wall, which is characterized by regularly spaced two-dimensional square cavities (grooves) placed normal to the flow. This is made up of 5 mm square grooved-wall, where square grooves are spaced 10, 20 and 40 element widths apart in the streamwise direction. A commercial CFD code-'Fluent 6.3' is used for the mean velocity and turbulence intensity calculation. Hexahedral meshing is used to mesh the domain, with the first grid point placed at a height of 0.001 mm till the dimensionless wall distance, y+ = 10 and afterwards the grid spacing was increased by aspect ratio of 1.1 to get a structured mesh. A steady state renormalized group (RNG) k-ε model is used for turbulence modeling with non-equilibrium wall functions for near wall treatment. CFD code is validated against the experimental data reported by Stuardi and Ching. The skin-friction coefficient determined from the velocity profile increases sharply just downstream of the groove. This overshoot is followed by an undershoot and then relaxation back to the smooth-wall value. This behavior is observed in most grooved-wall cases. Integrating the skin-friction coefficient in the streamwise direction indicates that there is an increase in the overall drag with maximum to be 3.54% for the single groove case.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 90%