2005
DOI: 10.1162/154247605775012897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence and Unemployment in a Job Matching Model

Abstract: Abstract. According to Ljungqvist and Sargent (1998), high European unemployment since the 1980s can be explained by a rise in economic turbulence, leading to greater numbers of unemployed workers with obsolete skills. These workers refuse new jobs due to high unemployment benefits. In this paper we reassess the turbulenceunemployment relationship using a matching model with endogenous job destruction.In our model, higher turbulence reduces the incentives of employed workers to leave their jobs. If turbulence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High‐skilled unemployment peaks before low‐skilled and goes below the steady state after five quarters. The low increase and eventual decrease in high‐skilled unemployment is consistent with the arguments expressed in den Haan, Haefke, and Ramey (2005). High‐skilled workers realize that if they become unemployed, they face the possibility of skill loss and a subsequent decrease in their probability of re‐employment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…High‐skilled unemployment peaks before low‐skilled and goes below the steady state after five quarters. The low increase and eventual decrease in high‐skilled unemployment is consistent with the arguments expressed in den Haan, Haefke, and Ramey (2005). High‐skilled workers realize that if they become unemployed, they face the possibility of skill loss and a subsequent decrease in their probability of re‐employment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The reason why the skill loss mechanism does not appear to improve the performance of the model with no skill heterogeneity, in terms of the persistence of the responses to a monetary shock, seems to be the same as the arguments made in den Haan, Haefke, and Ramey (2005). The possibility of skill deterioration during unemployment makes high‐skilled workers more reluctant to separate in a recession driven by an increase in interest rates, and this prevents the loss of skill mechanism, and the lower re‐employment probability of low‐skill workers, to have a first‐order effect on the responses of the model variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also study the interaction between a mean‐preserving spread of the productivity distribution across skills, intended to capture skill‐biased technical change, and labour‐market policies, such as unemployment benefits and firing taxes. Finally, den Haan, Haefke and Ramey (2005) study the quantitative implications of interest rate shocks within a calibrated version of the traditional Mortensen–Pissarides framework with various labour‐market policies.…”
Section: Technology–policy Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the remaining parameters, we follow the calibration strategy of Ljungqvist and Sargent (, ) and den Haan et al. () . Specifically, we choose these parameters to match observations from the empirical life‐cycle earnings profile estimated by Murphy and Welch () and others.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%