2015
DOI: 10.1111/iere.12093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological Learning and Labor Market Dynamics

Abstract: The search-and-matching model of the labor market fails to match two important business cycle facts: (i) a high volatility of unemployment relative to labor productivity, and (ii) a mild correlation between these two variables. We address these shortcomings by focusing on technological learning-by-doing: the notion that it takes workers' time using a technology before reaching their full productive potential with it. We consider a novel source of business cycles, namely, fluctuations in the speed of technologi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gervais et al. () consider the speed of technological learning as an alternative shock to productivity. This novel shock affects the time that it takes workers to reach the full potential of technological innovations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gervais et al. () consider the speed of technological learning as an alternative shock to productivity. This novel shock affects the time that it takes workers to reach the full potential of technological innovations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, while the quantitative implications of the DMP model for unemployment volatility have been thoroughly studied (see Merz 1995, Andolfatto 1996, den Haan, Ramey, and Watson 2000, Cole and Rogerson 2001, Hall 2005a, Shimer 2005, Yashiv 2006, Mortensen and Nagypal 2007, Hagedorn and Manovskii 2008, Fujita and Ramey 2012, Cheremukhin and Restrepo‐Echavarria 2014, Gervais et al. 2015, among others), its implications for cyclical asymmetry have surprisingly received little scrutiny.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pissarides () and Gervais et al. () use similar approaches to rescale the number of vacancy postings into JOLTS units of measurement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%