2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning the Flight Length of Molecules Diffusing on a Hydrophobic Surface

Abstract: Transport at solid-liquid interfaces is critical to self-assembly, biosensing, and heterogeneous catalysis, but surface diffusion remains difficult to characterize and rationally manipulate, due to the inherent heterogeneity of adsorption on solid surfaces. Using single-molecule tracking, we characterized the diffusion of a fluorescent long-chain surfactant on a hydrophobic surface, which involved periods of confinement alternating with bulk-mediated "flights". The concentration of methanol in solution was var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the distributions were broader) on surfaces corresponding to a stronger adsorbate-surface interaction. Previous work has suggested that surface diffusion was influenced by multiple effects, e.g., adsorbate-surface interactions (desorption rate), re-adsorption probability, physical obstacles, chemical surface heterogeneity, etc [24,[39][40][41][42][43]. The results presented here provide a comprehensive picture of how and why adsorbate-surface interactions influence interfacial motion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the distributions were broader) on surfaces corresponding to a stronger adsorbate-surface interaction. Previous work has suggested that surface diffusion was influenced by multiple effects, e.g., adsorbate-surface interactions (desorption rate), re-adsorption probability, physical obstacles, chemical surface heterogeneity, etc [24,[39][40][41][42][43]. The results presented here provide a comprehensive picture of how and why adsorbate-surface interactions influence interfacial motion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For example, theoretical models represent a flight as a series of hops (i.e. returns to the surface), where a molecule may stochastically re-adsorb after a given hop according to a hypothetical parameter known as the "sticking coefficient" [27]. While this parameter is theoretically the primary determinant of the flight-length, to date there has been no actual support for the presence of multiple hops per flight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24,[39][40][41][42][43]. The results presented here provide a comprehensive picture of how and why adsorbate-surface interactions influence interfacial motion.…”
Section: Prl 119 268001 (2017) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Ementioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, the evidence for the presence of three-dimensional (3D) hops remains indirect, and critical aspects of the proposed "hopping" process remain a mystery. For example, theoretical models represent a flight as a series of hops (i.e., returns to the surface), where a molecule may stochastically readsorb after a given hop according to a hypothetical parameter known as the "sticking coefficient" [27]. While this parameter is theoretically the primary determinant of the flight length, to date there has been no actual support for the presence of multiple hops per flight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of n are consistent with the effect of surface wettability. For a hydrophilic surface, the stronger liquid-solid affinity should result in a higher number of re-adsorption events as opposed to a hydrophobic surface [ 19 ]. In contrast, the surface hopping diffusion model greatly under-estimates the slip velocity, indicating that this mode of molecular motion is less likely to occur on the liquid-solid pair studied in the experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%