2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning oxygen vacancies on mesoporous ceria nanorods by metal doping: Controllable magnetic property

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PSD shows a broad peak centered at 35 nm corresponding to the inter-particle spaces in the scaffold-like assembly of nanorods [28]. The BET surface area of 91 m 2 g −1 and Vp of 0.63 cm 3 g −1 are in accordance with previous results [29,30]. The N 2 sorption isotherm of activated UiO-66-SO 3 H is a somewhat mixed type I/IV, with a sharp increase of gas uptake at the low-pressure range and an observable hysteresis between adsorption and desorption branches in the high relative pressure (P/P 0 ) range of 0.73-1.0.…”
Section: Textural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The PSD shows a broad peak centered at 35 nm corresponding to the inter-particle spaces in the scaffold-like assembly of nanorods [28]. The BET surface area of 91 m 2 g −1 and Vp of 0.63 cm 3 g −1 are in accordance with previous results [29,30]. The N 2 sorption isotherm of activated UiO-66-SO 3 H is a somewhat mixed type I/IV, with a sharp increase of gas uptake at the low-pressure range and an observable hysteresis between adsorption and desorption branches in the high relative pressure (P/P 0 ) range of 0.73-1.0.…”
Section: Textural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The six main peaks at about 1.44 × 10 −16 J (901.9 eV, U), 1.45 × 10 −16 J (907.9 eV, U 2 ), 1.47 × 10 −16 J (917.1 eV, U 3 ), 1.41 × 10 −16 J (882.7 eV, V), 1.42 × 10 −16 J (889.4 eV, V 2 ), and 1.44 × 10 −16 J (898.7 eV, V 3 ) are assigned to the presence of Ce 4+ . The other two peaks at 1.42 × 10 −16 J (885.0 eV, V 1 ) and 1.45 × 10 −16 J (903.5 eV, U 1 ) were assigned to Ce 3+ species, as shown by Xiao et al The content ratio of Ce 3+ was calculated from the peak area ratio between Ce 3+ and the total area with the results is presented in Table S1. The Au/CZ‐R presented the highest surface Ce 3+ concentration of ~ 27.7%, which means that this catalyst showed more oxygen vacancies than other catalysts, resulting from the charge transformation between Ce 3+ and Ce 4+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Compared to CeO 2 (2θ = 28.6°), the 2θ of 111 reflection of CZ x S was slightly shifted to higher angle, suchlike 29.83° for CZ 2 S, 29.95° for CZ 4 S and 29.99° for CZ 6 S showed in the enlarged view of Figure 1, which demonstrated the formations of a ceria–zirconia solid solution when Ce 4+ ions (0.097 nm) were replaced by smaller Zr 4+ ions (0.084 nm) that could lead to the shrinkage of lattice cell. [ 15,28 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to CeO 2 (2θ = 28.6 ), the 2θ of 111 reflection of CZ x S was slightly shifted to higher angle, suchlike 29.83 for CZ 2 S, 29.95 for CZ 4 S and 29.99 for CZ 6 S showed in the enlarged view of Figure 1, which demonstrated the formations of a ceria-zirconia solid solution when Ce 4+ ions (0.097 nm) were replaced by smaller Zr 4+ ions (0.084 nm) that could lead to the shrinkage of lattice cell. [15,28] To analyze the distribution of Zr species on the CZ x S samples, the field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were carried out on a representative CZ 4 S sample. Figure 2 depicted the results of these experiments.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation