2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.10.054026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning Methods for Semiconductor Spin Qubits

Abstract: We present efficient methods to reliably characterize and tune gate-defined semiconductor spin qubits. Our methods are designed to target the tuning procedures of semiconductor double quantum dot in GaAs heterostructures, but can easily be adapted to other quantum-dot-like qubit systems. These tuning procedures include the characterization of the inter-dot tunnel coupling, the tunnel coupling to the surrounding leads and the identification of the various fast initialization points for the operation of the qubi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the transport features that indicate the device is tuned as a double quantum dot are time-consuming to measure and difficult to parametrise. Machine learning techniques and other automated approaches have been used for tuning quantum devices [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . These techniques are limited to small regions of the device parameter space or require information about the device characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the transport features that indicate the device is tuned as a double quantum dot are time-consuming to measure and difficult to parametrise. Machine learning techniques and other automated approaches have been used for tuning quantum devices [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . These techniques are limited to small regions of the device parameter space or require information about the device characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For interqubit capacitive coupling we consider two cases, taking E c = 0 as a lower and E c = 350 µeV as an upper bound. The upper bound is estimated from a typical charge stability diagram by determining the distance of the triple points belonging to the (1, 0) − (2, 1) transition [35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress in quantum dots array sizes has been steady. Given that double and triple dots are being routinely used in experiments [17][18][19] and moderate linear array sizes (∼ 10 dots) [7], as well as two-dimensional arrays [6], are on the horizon, an auto-tuning procedure for these devices is a significant step for employing them in both the laboratories and in applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%